Joined: Aug 31 2005 Posts: 8546 Location: Location Location
blakeysrobin wrote:Radford code meaning can't handle high kicks. That's ok, we understand. He's "tweaked" something.
Being unable to leave the pitch unaided clearly is nothing more than a tweak. Shame he hadn't shattered his whole face like Sio, as this is a easy couple of days out jobbie.
Joined: Feb 12 2005 Posts: 13126 Location: East Staffordshire
WIZEB wrote:Just want us to be positive and try to take the game to them. We've been like rabbits in the headlights in a lot of recent derby games. It's far from the fact that they've been miles better than us its just that we've been poop scared to have a go. Us by 14
Fair summary other than the prediction.
Us by 12
"To play your best football you need players with enthusiasm and drive and energy." - Peter Sterling
Adam Pearson said not wrote:I know there are two franchises and two clubs (in Hull) and that will remain forever more
Joined: Jul 15 2005 Posts: 29816 Location: West Yorkshire
Structured wrote:So out of the four you posted would be back only two are in the squad and from them Kelly faces a late fitness test on the hamstring which has already caused him to pull out of training this week. So that could be 25% success rate. Well done
Because Chester has always selected his 17 from the 19 named 48 hours before.
Structured wrote:You appear to have again over looked Rovers best centre Goulding as being injured ( he is recovering from concussion unless of course you know different)
You appear to have again overlooked this
Mrs Barista wrote:That leaves Walker, Goulding and Graeme Horne. So 3 players.
Structured wrote:you continue to count fc squad players (who from most fans comments wouldn't get near the team in a full strength hull side
They're injured players. That's what we're discussing.
Structured wrote:JTP posts Sio will be playing with a broken jaw but teeth being wired together doesn't seem the best of preparation but whatever the case not exactly ideal
I think he was being sarcastic about the time-honoured "suspected broken jaw" fairytale. I was right, wasn't I? Again.
I think you're getting a bit bland. 8 of your last 10 rugby related posts are to me, or about me. Relax, have a drink and order 4 portions of rice.
Joined: Jul 15 2005 Posts: 29816 Location: West Yorkshire
blakeysrobin wrote:No kelly either. I'm not bothered by that, Blair is a better player there for me. FC by plenty, your time to win one and picking from a strong squad by dropping naughton and rankin.
Interesting. Haven't seen enough to comment but in a derby situation looks somewhat less fadgesque.
Mrs Barista wrote:Because Chester has always selected his 17 from the 19 named 48 hours before.
You appear to have again overlooked this They're injured players. That's what we're discussing.
I think he was being sarcastic about the time-honoured "suspected broken jaw" fairytale. I was right, wasn't I? Again.
I think you're getting a bit bland. 8 of your last 10 rugby related posts are to me, or about me. Relax, have a drink and order 4 portions of rice.
I understand now, cunning plan Barista ( or should I say Baldrick ) Hull players that are injured, Naughton for example is replaced by another player in your squad and is counted as injured in your list, whereas Rovers players such as Allgood, Walker and Tilse, for example are replaced by other Rovers players are not counted as injured by your reckoning. Creative accounting of a sort, I guess Think you will find by the way, and of course totally random, that so many Hull fans (and quite rightly so) are so confident of tomorrows result is because of Rovers injury situation, but I am sure a fair minded poster like yourself that this never crossed your mind
8/10 does seem to be your favourite recently, that's the third time in a row you have plucked the figure out of the air but hey ho whatever floats your boat.
By my reckoning another post on this thread and I think you will be up to thirty odd on this thread but to quote, like yourself, a JTP comment, 'it is the only excitement of a derby that gets her excited these days'. Unfortunately (or one could say fortunately for yourself) I think your excitement may be overflowing to the extreme tomorrow evening.
Structured wrote:I understand now, cunning plan Barista ( or should I say Baldrick ) Hull players that are injured, Naughton for example is replaced by another player in your squad and is counted as injured in your list, whereas Rovers players such as Allgood, Walker and Tilse, for example are replaced by other Rovers players are not counted as injured by your reckoning. Creative accounting of a sort, I guess Think you will find by the way, and of course totally random, that so many Hull fans (and quite rightly so) are so confident of tomorrows result is because of Rovers injury situation, but I am sure a fair minded poster like yourself that this never crossed your mind
8/10 does seem to be your favourite recently, that's the third time in a row you have plucked the figure out of the air but hey ho whatever floats your boat.
By my reckoning another post on this thread and I think you will be up to thirty odd on this thread but to quote, like yourself, a JTP comment, 'it is the only excitement of a derby that gets her excited these days'. Unfortunately (or one could say fortunately for yourself) I think your excitement may be overflowing to the extreme tomorrow evening.
Anyway, safe travel and plenty of
Cup Winners: 1914, 1982, 2005, 2016, 2017. Cup Runners-Up: 1908, 1909, 1910, 1922, 1923, 1959, 1960, 1980, 1983, 1985, 2008, 2013. League Champions: 1920, 1921, 1936, 1956, 1958, 1983. League Runners-Up: 1957, 1982, 1984, 2006.
Looking at the squads you should win it, we will no doubt try to make this an expansive game and keep it away from a forward battle. Field position will be critical so this could be decided on who hands the ball over and where.
I hope Shaul doesn't play, he has looked the player most likely to trouble us whereas Rankin hasn't looked much in derby games (although he has tended to be in the halfs). Targeting Talanoa (if on the wing) should be the order of the day, he's always looked dodgy under kicks and out of position for cut out passes.
Can actually see this being a draw, we're probably due one.
Joined: Mar 14 2003 Posts: 26014 Location: Back in Hull.
On paper we should win, even though one Rovers fan has claimed even with injuries their 17 is better than ours.
There wings look dangerous and if we don't deal with their kicks it will cause us problems. Halfs are dangerous, particularly if Kelly plays. Dixon will cause us problems with his Pace, but should be targeted. Out pack should dominate, if it doesn't we might as well give up. It's up to the halfs to create and the backs to finish.
We have played some excellent rugby the last two games, so if continues and we complete more sets I think we should win this.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum