Joined: Aug 30 2005 Posts: 3231 Location: in a cave
If he was dropped for Salford the club should have said he was dropped. No-one has a god given right to be picked and if Radford preferred Rankin for that fixture then fair enough.
If he was injured the club should have said he was injured.
What's wrong witrh being transparent and honest?
First there was wisdom Then there was knowledge Now there is only information
Joined: Mar 11 2007 Posts: 5659 Location: Next to Ramsgate Sands c.1850 in West Hull
Dave K. wrote:Should be end of thread, was injured last week, typical HDM running a story over a week late and causing a fuss over nothing, hopefully the next Hull writer for the HDM is better than Smailes.
How can the story be over a week late?
If it was "last week's story" it must've been written on Saturday or Sunday because it refers to "Friday night's victory over Salford".
I'm afraid I don't believe it for a second and believe James Smailes when he states he was only reporting what Radford told him. Here's what he said on Twitter:
Here's the story. Reads to me like this week's news, not last week's:
Hull FC will take a cautious approach with full-back Jamie Shaul in order to address a concerning injury problem.
Shaul missed Friday night's victory over Salford Red Devils having seen his training limited once again due a series of niggling injuries and he looks set to stay on the sidelines for now.
Having struggled with a persistent ankle problem which has limited his training time this year, Radford says Hull need to get their young star physically right before reintroducing the 22-year-old back into the side.
"For a kid of Jamie's age, the amount of training sessions he is missing is a bit of a concern," said Radford.
Shaul has missed five games this season through injury, with an ankle problem causing his longest lay-off.
Despite playing the past five games before his Salford omission, Shaul was not 100 per cent fit.
With Jordan Rankin's presence needed in the halves due to an injury to Marc Sneyd, Shaul played despite having his training during the week limited, and will now take his time to correct any problems.
Dave K. wrote:Should be end of thread, was injured last week, typical HDM running a story over a week late and causing a fuss over nothing, hopefully the next Hull writer for the HDM is better than Smailes.
How can the story be over a week late?
If it was "last week's story" it must've been written on Saturday or Sunday because it refers to "Friday night's victory over Salford".
I'm afraid I don't believe it for a second and believe James Smailes when he states he was only reporting what Radford told him. Here's what he said on Twitter:
Here's the story. Reads to me like this week's news, not last week's:
Hull FC will take a cautious approach with full-back Jamie Shaul in order to address a concerning injury problem.
Shaul missed Friday night's victory over Salford Red Devils having seen his training limited once again due a series of niggling injuries and he looks set to stay on the sidelines for now.
Having struggled with a persistent ankle problem which has limited his training time this year, Radford says Hull need to get their young star physically right before reintroducing the 22-year-old back into the side.
"For a kid of Jamie's age, the amount of training sessions he is missing is a bit of a concern," said Radford.
Shaul has missed five games this season through injury, with an ankle problem causing his longest lay-off.
Despite playing the past five games before his Salford omission, Shaul was not 100 per cent fit.
With Jordan Rankin's presence needed in the halves due to an injury to Marc Sneyd, Shaul played despite having his training during the week limited, and will now take his time to correct any problems.
Joined: Jan 11 2005 Posts: 3914 Location: West Hull
WormInHand wrote:How can the story be over a week late?
If it was "last week's story" it must've been written on Saturday or Sunday because it refers to "Friday night's victory over Salford".
I'm afraid I don't believe it for a second and believe James Smailes when he states he was only reporting what Radford told him. Here's what he said on Twitter:
Here's the story. Reads to me like this week's news, not last week's:
Hull FC will take a cautious approach with full-back Jamie Shaul in order to address a concerning injury problem.
Shaul missed Friday night's victory over Salford Red Devils having seen his training limited once again due a series of niggling injuries and he looks set to stay on the sidelines for now.
Having struggled with a persistent ankle problem which has limited his training time this year, Radford says Hull need to get their young star physically right before reintroducing the 22-year-old back into the side.
"For a kid of Jamie's age, the amount of training sessions he is missing is a bit of a concern," said Radford.
Shaul has missed five games this season through injury, with an ankle problem causing his longest lay-off.
Despite playing the past five games before his Salford omission, Shaul was not 100 per cent fit.
With Jordan Rankin's presence needed in the halves due to an injury to Marc Sneyd, Shaul played despite having his training during the week limited, and will now take his time to correct any problems.
At 6pm tonight on RH.. there is an interview with Shaul & Radford..
From a snippett of the interview, I thought I heard Shaul say, he was 'fit' last week, but dropped against Salford.
WormInHand wrote:How can the story be over a week late?
If it was "last week's story" it must've been written on Saturday or Sunday because it refers to "Friday night's victory over Salford".
I'm afraid I don't believe it for a second and believe James Smailes when he states he was only reporting what Radford told him. Here's what he said on Twitter:
Here's the story. Reads to me like this week's news, not last week's:
Hull FC will take a cautious approach with full-back Jamie Shaul in order to address a concerning injury problem.
Shaul missed Friday night's victory over Salford Red Devils having seen his training limited once again due a series of niggling injuries and he looks set to stay on the sidelines for now.
Having struggled with a persistent ankle problem which has limited his training time this year, Radford says Hull need to get their young star physically right before reintroducing the 22-year-old back into the side.
"For a kid of Jamie's age, the amount of training sessions he is missing is a bit of a concern," said Radford.
Shaul has missed five games this season through injury, with an ankle problem causing his longest lay-off.
Despite playing the past five games before his Salford omission, Shaul was not 100 per cent fit.
With Jordan Rankin's presence needed in the halves due to an injury to Marc Sneyd, Shaul played despite having his training during the week limited, and will now take his time to correct any problems.
Sebasteeno wrote:Thought it was worth of its own thread seen as its getting mentioned on others. So what is exactly going on? Shaul claims hes fit - the club says hes unfit and now Radio Humberside are claiming that Radford and Shaul are having clear the air talks. Just what is the club playing at the moment as im baffled as to what the hell is going on with it?
So you are automatically blaming the club without hearing any of the facts?
Agree ...regardless whether he was fit or dropped is immaterial he did not play ..we won Rankin had a good game but some want to jump on anything its pathetic
Joined: Aug 01 2005 Posts: 5917 Location: Definately not in the Cuddle Crew
ComeOnYouUll wrote:So you are automatically blaming the club without hearing any of the facts?
The facts are Shaul is not injured and hasnt been for both Salford and now Warrington as hes said and the club are claiming he injured so the club are lieing
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
