carl_spackler wrote:Agreed. Again, IF Foster comes in and plays, by my reckoning he'll be wearing shirt number 40. I don't honestly recall ever seeing a player with such a high number in his back in SL. Tells you masses about what Gentle is dealing with.

Goochie wrote:Be 39 won't he? Point still stands though about such a high number, and I think we've used 36 players this season, surely no one else has matched that so far?

carl_spackler wrote:Nope, clean forgot about McKinnon, just looked at the current squad list, cheers. So a full 17 then. Crazy.

Goochie wrote:Be 39 won't he? Point still stands though about such a high number, and I think we've used 36 players this season, surely no one else has matched that so far?

carl_spackler wrote:Didn't Cunningham wear that at the weekend?

Wellsy13 wrote:I also think Kent debuted in 2010.

Wellsy13 wrote:You've forgotten O'Carroll as well.

Wellsy13 wrote:I also think Kent debuted in 2010.

Staffs FC wrote:Spot on - according to some Gentle should be doing better but this shows that he is doing bloody well. IFs and BUTs perhaps but the wins that should have been against KR and Wakefield would have seen us in a very handy position despite this massive and almost unmanageable turnover of players.

Sebasteeno wrote::lol:

If your definition of doing bloody well is losing most games at a wimper then god knows what doing badly must be