Staffs FC wrote:Couldn't agree more. Was interesting listening recently when Gary Kemble and James Leuluai were back in town and reminiscing about the 80's team. All the staff and players seemed to stick together then. I know modern day pros SHOULDN'T be on the lash all the time but socialising and being on the lash are two different things. Seems that at our club at least most players are merely contractors now and the fabric of the club means very little to most. Berro further hinted at it the other night when saying players should be playing for the bloke next to them. More reason than ever for the impending clearout.
Careful! I alluded to the same thing a couple of weeks ago and was accused of perpetrating the idea that a team can only bond of they're continually on the p1$$. My attitude apparently stank, too!
But I took a lot from what the Kiwis said about the team working and playing together. It just doesn't seem to happen now presumably because of the clean living necessary for the honing of Super League athletes. But I can't help thinking that all work and no play AT ALL make Hull a very dull set of individuals.
And people can't tell me that it doesn't happen occasionally at other clubs that do well. Even Morgan took the Rovers team out on the lash yesterday, according to their board. Vella is always going on about barbeques that the whole team attend and who's nicked who's tinnies. As for the NRL...
I think our current setup is a bit sterile and, yes I agree, our "team" is a collection of contracted individuals who don't have a bond with each other never mind the club and it's fans.
Just my opinion, of course
(Dan FC )