Joined: Jun 28 2002 Posts: 11184 Location: Castleford
Lunt - Grade A for the tackle on Watts Allgood - Grade B Deliberate contact with referee Carney - Grade B - Lifting and dropping player Jullien - Grade A - Same as Lunt but on Gadwin Springer
Black 'n' White's Best Female 2006 & Runner Up 2007 & 2008 "We will not accept a top eight finish as a barometer of supposed success at any point in the future whilst I am the owner of this club", A Pearson 23/09/2011
Joined: Nov 30 2014 Posts: 1264 Location: Inside my own head
Good that that allgood one is in there, any touching of the ref should be a ban, its disrespectful and undermines their authority by violating their space. I think it was said in commentary at the time that in the nrl that would be an immediate sending off and ban so we will see.
Joined: Jan 30 2004 Posts: 8278 Location: Never never land away with the fairies
Smiggs wrote:for Washbrook or Taylor
Or for Carlos.
Cant believe Lunt is only on a NFA-1 Grade A charge though just shows what a farce the Disciplinary is when Allgood is on a 1-2 Grade B for touching the ref. Yes I know a player should never touch an official and rightly should cop a ban but it wasn't a vicious attack or any chance of causing injury more just stupidity but Lunt could have seriously injured Watts, and he certainly showed intent by having 2 goes at doing it.
I really enjoy long walks especially when they are taken by people I don't like!
Surprised on the Lunt one, thought it would be a B and feared a C. I don't go with the causing an injury means more, thats just luck. If it had been the other way round I'd have been calling for more.
Taylor's was never a ban, penalty for contact with the head (as seems the norm now) and nothing more.
Allgood touched the ref but I've seen that go unmentioned plenty of times before but now its been brought up that'll be a ban
It does seem a bit wrong that Allgood gets B and Lunt gets A. I understand the importance of respecting the referee, but it wasn't like he assaulted him in any way. He put his hand on his shoulder, personally I would be more bothered about the way he was shouting at him than the fact he touched him.
Joined: Jan 16 2003 Posts: 6734 Location: At the cider bus, Worthy Farm, Somerset
barham red wrote:Surprised on the Lunt one, thought it would be a B and feared a C. I don't go with the causing an injury means more, thats just luck. If it had been the other way round I'd have been calling for more.
Taylor's was never a ban, penalty for contact with the head (as seems the norm now) and nothing more.
Allgood touched the ref but I've seen that go unmentioned plenty of times before but now its been brought up that'll be a ban
agree with most of that but contact with the ref needs nipping in the bud before it becomes a problem, regardless of which club's players are involved. in general a minimum 2 game ban would help in this area with no exemptions for EGP (its more of a conduct/dissent issue than foul play). but i agree with you that it needs to be applied consistently.
yorksguy1865 wrote:Good that that allgood one is in there, any touching of the ref should be a ban, its disrespectful and undermines their authority by violating their space. I think it was said in commentary at the time that in the nrl that would be an immediate sending off and ban so we will see.
Indeed. Worth mentioning that it can be a sending off in the UK as well, so he was lucky in that respect.
If you are interested in Building Information Modelling (BIM). PM me.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
