Read the Charlie Mullins report in the Wail. Rovers would have won if the video ref hadn't been there to give the correct decision on the Murrell knock on. As Silverwood had seen the incident and referred it why hadn't he blown in the first place. Rovers would have won if Luaki had been sin binned - no reference to Murrell/Newton and Cockayne cheap shots etc.. Cannot quite see the point of having a biased report in the local rag

TBF they do two reports, one with a Hull FC slant, one with a Rovers slant.

Don't see the problem, personally.

mullin also gave ben galah 8 out 10, which prooves what a hack he is, a bad one!

I reckon Mullin is Gollums love child

I blame the people who buy the rag and keep them all in a job

Me too...mind you I read it as the lad is a delivery boy

To be honest....Charlie and James Smailes are a great pair of blokes. They have helped us out with the Life For A Kid Charity on a few occasions. Charlie is Hull KR barmy and James is opposite. They see the game as fans as well as supporters.....I dont see the problem with that. Basicaly....The KR fans will read Mullans report and feel less gutted....If we had lost, I expect we would be reading about why the ref let KR off with loads.
Read Ben Galea's summary.....in the Mail.....Now that is a royal whinge.

In my homest opinion....that Fewey fella is areal wonker. OK hired by the Mail to be contravercial.....But he knows nowt, or as much as the idiotic KR fans that write in. Now he claims to be almost non-biased....But he has a secret crush on Hull KR

Hame has obviously wound Mullan up which is good.

Both reports are perthetic no mention of Lauaki in either .
Stop getting the thing if can't comment on the truth .
Think both in pub with Gwollum cause he never saw match by his talk afterwards

I thought Rovers had fallen out with the HDM, but this rather slanted article suggests otherwise. What happened to their pending legal proceedings about local media coverage?