Mr. Zucchini Head wrote:But why not?

I'm not knocking what Wynne did btw, he was very good again and looks a star in the making, but we were a different beast when Kelly was on. Why wouldn't you just have your two most dangerous players on the park from the beginning? Or is holding Kelly back until the second half getting the best out of him?

Anyone with a more insightful response than just, "no"?

Mild mannered Janitor wrote:The half back situation was alway going to be a conundrum if all three were fit. Leave one out and you can bet there would be a transfer request in .

Radford has taken some flack for not using youth. Here he is integrated Wynne into the team at a time he has the luxury of jiving the kid a breather with Connor moving to FB.

On the flip side to this, we are seeing Griffin started at centre and moved to the back row, Connor goes to centre.

Then Kelly gets introduced. Fresh legs against tiring players.

Fair play to Radford for working this scenario

Mild mannered Janitor wrote:The half back situation was alway going to be a conundrum if all three were fit. Leave one out and you can bet there would be a transfer request in .

Radford has taken some flack for not using youth. Here he is integrated Wynne into the team at a time he has the luxury of jiving the kid a breather with Connor moving to FB.

On the flip side to this, we are seeing Griffin started at centre and moved to the back row, Connor goes to centre.

Then Kelly gets introduced. Fresh legs against tiring players.

Fair play to Radford for working this scenario