Full details of decision now available here

Full details of decision now available here

ccs wrote:Full details of decision now available here Tells us all we need to know. If the Match Review Panel thought the DVD was inconclusive why did they expect the Independent Tribunal to come to a different view? It does seem to be the case that photos and a medical report were produced. I wonder if the RFL commissioned these or if they were submitted by Rovers.

ccs wrote:Full details of decision now available here Tells us all we need to know. If the Match Review Panel thought the DVD was inconclusive why did they expect the Independent Tribunal to come to a different view? It does seem to be the case that photos and a medical report were produced. I wonder if the RFL commissioned these or if they were submitted by Rovers.

I didn't like the way they ended the summary with that there was no conclusive proof of a 'deliberate' bite which to me infers they still think he bit Walker which given the actual physical evidence which showed there was no bite and the swinging arm to the mouth area makes that comment churlish at best.
I'd be insisting they amend to there is no evidence of the player biting an opponent full stop.