| WWW.RLFANS.COM https://rlfans.com/forums/ |
|
| IMG scores https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=648042 |
Page 1 of 4 |
| Author: | PopTart [ Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:26 am ] | ||||
| Post subject: | IMG scores | ||||
|
|||||
| Author: | Khlav Kalash [ Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:38 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: IMG scores |
I can't see how they have improved by 1.5 points, but the issue is they seem to be under the assumption no one else has improved their score. Trinty are looking at 1.5 point min increase but there are tangible differences between last year and this. Leigh will improve with better finishes and financial wizardy, and Cas are doing a bodge to get the score they need. Toulouse don't seem to be doing much but are confident about SL, although Houles had a bit of a whinge about Trinity offering 4 year deals to Internationals while still in the Championship. |
|
| Author: | Prince Buster [ Tue Jul 02, 2024 8:43 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: IMG scores |
Bradford Bull Sh...ters more like. Their stadium is a latrine and f worse than BV was before the developments They have been busy how many times Their crowds are way below they actually state They have not been in SL for several years so I fail to see how they score high on performance But most of all their joke of a pitch is not even legal dimensions Like everything else that comes out of that club, I find it hard to believe. However ! if they are telling the truth and this is correct, then all I can say is that IMG is a giant charade because it makes a mockery or their point scoring criteria |
|
| Author: | PopTart [ Tue Jul 02, 2024 9:04 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: IMG scores |
I don't really see why people have a problem with the stadium. I was happy enough when I went last time. They just need more people in it. The pitch is small but that's an RFL standards thing. |
|
| Author: | PopTart [ Tue Jul 02, 2024 9:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: IMG scores |
Khlav Kalash wrote:I can't see how they have improved by 1.5 points, but the issue is they seem to be under the assumption no one else has improved their score. Trinty are looking at 1.5 point min increase but there are tangible differences between last year and this. Leigh will improve with better finishes and financial wizardy, and Cas are doing a bodge to get the score they need. Toulouse don't seem to be doing much but are confident about SL, although Houles had a bit of a whinge about Trinity offering 4 year deals to Internationals while still in the Championship. Unfortunately that's the same for us too. You are shooting blind until you get an A score. It depends as much on other clubs progress as your own. |
|
| Author: | AgbriggAmbler [ Tue Jul 02, 2024 9:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: IMG scores |
Stood on the 'away' end in the 1895 Cup semi it was plain to see that the concrete terracing is crumbling away. I don't have a gripe about the stadium, just it's state of repair and shabbiness. The pitch should stop them getting into SL, but put a full sized decent pitch in there and improve the stadium and they should have the same eligibility as anybody else. |
|
| Author: | Trojan Horse [ Tue Jul 02, 2024 11:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: IMG scores |
A lot of their attendances since 2022 fall below 3500 so big question as to whether they can get into same band as trinity. I actually checked and average attendance this season… Bulls - 2900… Toulouse - 2435… Trinity 6138 They don’t really fall into the 3500 bracket even. Honestly, it’s all sticking chests out but when it comes to it Trinity are in a far better position on pretty much every front vs Bulls except Media which Bulls do well in (though in believe we’ll be in same band for subscriptions etc) and points. Absolutely not worried in the slightest. From last season we have very obvious improvements in facilities, media, finance/investment and also guaranteed extra points with the 1895. Then there’s potentially LED boards. If we can’t be in with 13 million investment and such rapid improvement then Ellis may as well give up. Trinity are a prime example for IMG to showcase and shout about for how the new model brings growth to clubs who buy into it. We have done everything asked and more and are effectively an IMG success story ready to be used. In fact even more so if we are back in SL next season and make playoffs. Would be a big feather in the cap for the IMG era. I’m fully expecting Trinity to be in SL next season. |
|
| Author: | PopTart [ Tue Jul 02, 2024 11:48 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: IMG scores |
I'm not suggesting Wakefield should be worried. There is a pack of teams behind us that should be though. |
|
| Author: | Trojan Horse [ Tue Jul 02, 2024 11:53 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: IMG scores |
Sorry I can’t quote posts Poptart. This site is horrible having to press submit and quote numerous times before it loads or accepts a post. Naturally I think we have to be wary but it’s just clubs trying to drum up positivity in Bulls/Toulouse’s case (Toulouse unprofessionally imo by trying to discredit trinity in poor taste). Then you have London playing the violin and trying to save their hides with the ominous sad music playing. I’m impressed the club is being professional and setting out its stall and backing it up. The club could easily have responded to Toulouse making suggestive comments about our clubs contract nagotiations but remained professional which was nice to see. |
|
| Author: | charlie [ Tue Jul 02, 2024 12:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: IMG scores |
They're just trying to keep the morale of the fan base up IMO |
|
| Page 1 of 4 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|