WWW.RLFANS.COM
https://rlfans.com/forums/

conspiracy theory or something and nothing
https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=395156		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  mwildcats [ Wed Feb 18, 2009 12:22 am ]
Post subject:  conspiracy theory or something and nothing
http://www.skysports.com/opinion/story/ ... 91,00.html

OK, Just spotted this found it quite intresting tbh, shows how a team has been discplined by rfl for offences, obv all cases are individual however some of the teams ive put in bold are quite contrasting, so we went to diciplinary committee 4 times and our players were banned a total of 8 matches, bradford for eg, had 5 visits to DC and only 3 match bans also catalans had 5 more visits to DC than ourselves (4 cm 9) only had 1 more match bans than us (9 cm 8 ). Another one hull kr had 9 more visits to the Disciplinary Committe than ourselves but only had 4 match bans.

Before the trolls start i know each case is different, however it could back up some of our siege mentality everyone is against us attitude.

Food for thought,

No. of times player referred to Disciplinary Committee
Total number of games players suspended over 2008


Bradford 5 - 3
Castleford 5 - 8
Catalan 9 - 8
Huddersfield 7 - 6
Hull 2 - 0
Hull KR 11 - 4
Harlequins 9 - 8
Leeds 8 - 5
St Helens 3 - 3
Wakefield 4 - 8
Warrington 10 - 8
Wigan 12 - 12
http://www.skysports.com/opinion/story/ ... 91,00.html

OK, Just spotted this found it quite intresting tbh, shows how a team has been discplined by rfl for offences, obv all cases are individual however some of the teams ive put in bold are quite contrasting, so we went to diciplinary committee 4 times and our players were banned a total of 8 matches, bradford for eg, had 5 visits to DC and only 3 match bans also catalans had 5 more visits to DC than ourselves (4 cm 9) only had 1 more match bans than us (9 cm 8 ). Another one hull kr had 9 more visits to the Disciplinary Committe than ourselves but only had 4 match bans.

Before the trolls start i know each case is different, however it could back up some of our siege mentality everyone is against us attitude.

Food for thought,

No. of times player referred to Disciplinary Committee
Total number of games players suspended over 2008


Bradford 5 - 3
Castleford 5 - 8
Catalan 9 - 8
Huddersfield 7 - 6
Hull 2 - 0
Hull KR 11 - 4
Harlequins 9 - 8
Leeds 8 - 5
St Helens 3 - 3
Wakefield 4 - 8
Warrington 10 - 8
Wigan 12 - 12
Author:  Uptoncat [ Wed Feb 18, 2009 12:42 am ]
Post subject:  Re: conspiracy theory or something and nothing
mwildcats wrote:http://www.skysports.com/opinion/story/0,25212,12532_4910891,00.html

OK, Just spotted this found it quite intresting tbh, shows how a team has been discplined by rfl for offences, obv all cases are individual however some of the teams ive put in bold are quite contrasting, so we went to diciplinary committee 4 times and our players were banned a total of 8 matches, bradford for eg, had 5 visits to DC and only 3 match bans also catalans had 5 more visits to DC than ourselves (4 cm 9) only had 1 more match bans than us (9 cm 8 ). Another one hull kr had 9 more visits to the Disciplinary Committe than ourselves but only had 4 match bans.

Before the trolls start i know each case is different, however it could back up some of our siege mentality everyone is against us attitude.

Food for thought,

No. of times player referred to Disciplinary Committee
Total number of games players suspended over 2008


Bradford 5 - 3
Castleford 5 - 8
Catalan 9 - 8
Huddersfield 7 - 6
Hull 2 - 0
Hull KR 11 - 4
Harlequins 9 - 8
Leeds 8 - 5
St Helens 3 - 3
Wakefield 4 - 8
Warrington 10 - 8
Wigan 12 - 12


Am I correct in saing Latu got all 8 matches for us? If so that blows the conspiracy theory straight out of the window really as all the other 3 got let off
Author:  mwildcats [ Wed Feb 18, 2009 12:53 am ]
Post subject: 
pretty sure p reilly got 2 for the "trip", was latu's really that bad ?

only asking?
Author:  Uptoncat [ Wed Feb 18, 2009 1:22 am ]
Post subject: 
mwildcats wrote:pretty sure p reilly got 2 for the "trip", was latu's really that bad ?

only asking?


My mistake, I was thinking of the racism but that was 07 - he got 6 matches.
Been on RFL site and our charges were as follows

Reilly Tripping 1 match ban
Latu High tackle 3 match ban
Bibey Off ball incident 2 match ban
Tom Wandless dangerous throw 2 match ban (Reserve team game)
Author:  tim [ Wed Feb 18, 2009 3:46 am ]
Post subject: 
Uptoncat wrote:My mistake, I was thinking of the racism but that was 07 - he got 6 matches.
Been on RFL site and our charges were as follows

Reilly Tripping 1 match ban
Latu High tackle 3 match ban
Bibey Off ball incident 2 match ban
Tom Wandless dangerous throw 2 match ban (Reserve team game)


iirc, that was when he smacked Randall in the back of the head after he had passed it at BV.
Author:  Dead Man Walking [ Wed Feb 18, 2009 12:20 pm ]
Post subject: 
mwildcats wrote:pretty sure p reilly got 2 for the "trip", was latu's really that bad ?

only asking?


Wasn't Latu banned for racially abusing a player last season ?
Author:  Khlav Kalash [ Wed Feb 18, 2009 12:22 pm ]
Post subject: 
Dead Man Walking wrote:Wasn't Latu banned for racially abusing a player last season ?

Season before.
Author:  Dead Man Walking [ Wed Feb 18, 2009 12:36 pm ]
Post subject: 
Khlav Kalash wrote:Season before.


Sorry.
Author:  J.T [ Wed Feb 18, 2009 1:39 pm ]
Post subject: 
Dead Man Walking wrote:Sorry.


Hardly your fault.
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/