littlerich wrote:Do you own a pitbull by any chance?
Pepe ...................................... run.
Run like the wind my friend ....................................
Hey im fine with pepe just think we shouldent be slagging our own fans of with the 1 of the greatest moments coming up in our history as ive said i do get a bit exited about things and maybe should have a little think before posting.As ive said i would like to see wakey in super if they meet there requirement.
Joined: Apr 18 2006 Posts: 5870 Location: God's little green acre - Widnes!
littlerich wrote:Do you own a pitbull by any chance?
Pepe ...................................... run.
Run like the wind my friend ....................................
On thread drift:
tb wrote:Tough. Conversations develop. It's their nature.
Little Pepe went to nursery school one day wearing his Widnes hat. His teacher asked him why he was a Widnes fan. He said, “Because my parents are.” His teacher said, “That’s not good. What would you do if your parents were drug dealers and hookers?” He replied, “Well then I would be a Warrington fan.”
There's a Wooly over there, baggy kecks and feathered hair with a 3 star jumper half way up his back, that’s a fecking Wooly back! Oooh-to… Oooh-to-be… Oooh-to-be-a… WOOLY!
Joined: Apr 18 2006 Posts: 5870 Location: God's little green acre - Widnes!
littlerich wrote:You're kidding right? How about in 2012? Do you reckon he'll have to put money in? You betchya! If he doesn't it'll be a short stay in SL for Widnes.
For supposedly well run clubs who don't need sugar daddy's read Hull KR. They were a model NL1 club and got promoted with a team of dedicated backers and hard workers. Still, have a look at their debts and come back and tell me that Widnes don't need O'Connor chucking money at them.
Did you just not bother reading the rest of my post, or did you just completely ignore it?
Please read this 1,000 times or until it’s significance enters your thick Yorkist bonce.
Pepe wrote:He has also promised that Widnes will be playing up to the full cap (as confirmed by Terry O’Connor in last weeks RL press), should they get a SL licence. There can be only one source of financial imput here, in order to achieve this - That is Steve O’Connor.
On thread drift:
tb wrote:Tough. Conversations develop. It's their nature.
Little Pepe went to nursery school one day wearing his Widnes hat. His teacher asked him why he was a Widnes fan. He said, “Because my parents are.” His teacher said, “That’s not good. What would you do if your parents were drug dealers and hookers?” He replied, “Well then I would be a Warrington fan.”
There's a Wooly over there, baggy kecks and feathered hair with a 3 star jumper half way up his back, that’s a fecking Wooly back! Oooh-to… Oooh-to-be… Oooh-to-be-a… WOOLY!
Joined: Apr 18 2006 Posts: 5870 Location: God's little green acre - Widnes!
viking.gb wrote:Not a widnes fan I love the club so what my arguments might not be the best but are ment in the right way.why did i get this done http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=3 ... 9359094260 not a widnes fan jog on
Nice Tat, the tattoo ain’t bad either.
viking.gb wrote:Hey im fine with pepe just think we shouldent be slagging our own fans of with the 1 of the greatest moments coming up in our history as ive said i do get a bit exited about things and maybe should have a little think before posting.As ive said i would like to see wakey in super if they meet there requirement.
Many of your posts are just appalling. The cr@p you wrote on the Harlequins board was utterly cringe-worthy, and here you are again doing the same thing.
viking.gb wrote:Not a widnes fan I love the club so what my arguments might not be the best but are ment in the right way.why did i get this done http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=3 ... 9359094260 not a widnes fan jog on
Nice Tat, the tattoo ain’t bad either.
viking.gb wrote:Hey im fine with pepe just think we shouldent be slagging our own fans of with the 1 of the greatest moments coming up in our history as ive said i do get a bit exited about things and maybe should have a little think before posting.As ive said i would like to see wakey in super if they meet there requirement.
Many of your posts are just appalling. The cr@p you wrote on the Harlequins board was utterly cringe-worthy, and here you are again doing the same thing.
On thread drift:
tb wrote:Tough. Conversations develop. It's their nature.
Little Pepe went to nursery school one day wearing his Widnes hat. His teacher asked him why he was a Widnes fan. He said, “Because my parents are.” His teacher said, “That’s not good. What would you do if your parents were drug dealers and hookers?” He replied, “Well then I would be a Warrington fan.”
There's a Wooly over there, baggy kecks and feathered hair with a 3 star jumper half way up his back, that’s a fecking Wooly back! Oooh-to… Oooh-to-be… Oooh-to-be-a… WOOLY!
Many of your posts are just appalling. The cr@p you wrote on the Harlequins board was utterly cringe-worthy, and here you are again doing the same thing.
I did get caught up a bit in the quins thing and was bad of me,wasnt as bad on here then they started slagging widnes of ,saying we had a drug dealer running our club,and guess i let rip a bit.We all cant be as tactful as you pepe. And lets not forget its you that has taken over my argument so why bother if my posts a re shiiiiiiiiiiiiii,
Cant believe it, wasnt very confident(years of knockbacks), think Phil Townsend should be given freedom of the city. Hope we keep the momentum up if cas get going before us we could end up with new ground but no SL licence
Joined: Apr 18 2006 Posts: 5870 Location: God's little green acre - Widnes!
viking.gb wrote:I did get caught up a bit in the quins thing and was bad of me,wasnt as bad on here then they started slagging widnes of ,saying we had a drug dealer running our club,and guess i let rip a bit.
No-one was slagging off Widnes until you came on here trolling, by playing down the significance of their clubs’ approved planning victory in the courts. So there would be no anti Widnes bile on here if you had just understood what this thread was about and respected it.
viking.gb wrote: We all cant be as tactful as you pepe.
I’m far from tactful, as you can see.
viking.gb wrote: And lets not forget its you that has taken over my argument so why bother if my posts a re shiiiiiiiiiiiiii,
You never had an argument and, if you did, I wouldn’t have taken it over. I’ve had to fight fires on this thread, which were lit by you, that’s all.
This is my last post on this thread, as it is exists here for jubilant and well deserved congratulations, or at least it was until you ruined it.
On thread drift:
tb wrote:Tough. Conversations develop. It's their nature.
Little Pepe went to nursery school one day wearing his Widnes hat. His teacher asked him why he was a Widnes fan. He said, “Because my parents are.” His teacher said, “That’s not good. What would you do if your parents were drug dealers and hookers?” He replied, “Well then I would be a Warrington fan.”
There's a Wooly over there, baggy kecks and feathered hair with a 3 star jumper half way up his back, that’s a fecking Wooly back! Oooh-to… Oooh-to-be… Oooh-to-be-a… WOOLY!
Joined: Aug 18 2005 Posts: 27039 Location: In the fridge
Pepe wrote:No-one was slagging off Widnes until you came on here trolling, by playing down the significance of their clubs’ approved planning victory in the courts. So there would be no anti Widnes bile on here if you had just understood what this thread was about and respected it.
I’m far from tactful, as you can see.
You never had an argument and, if you did, I wouldn’t have taken it over. I’ve had to fight fires on this thread, which were lit by you, that’s all.
This is my last post on this thread, as it is exists here for jubilant and well deserved congratulations, or at least it was until you ruined it.
Glad to hear and thanks for showing some sense.
Anymore "outside" interference will be removed along with the posters.
How far are we a long compared to Castleford and Salford, who currently seem to be our major rivals for the drop? This is mainly what I’ve heard from certain people but I’m not too sure about some of this and if anyone could share any information and help clarify/confirm our situation in relation to the other clubs it would be appreciated.
Us - Just got the basic planning permission, however due to the wait we have had, seem to have sorted out any future problems. Also it’s now in the hands of the regional government, who want this kind of development. Plus we have funding for our stadium. This is all good and short of discovering a Roman temple under Newmarket should get the go ahead.
Castleford – Also have basic planning permission but still haven’t applied for detailed, although I’d expect that to change around Monday or Tuesday. Funding the project seems like a problem with a large chunk of money coming from the sale of the old ground. However surely since 2006, which was when the ground was priced, or so I’ve been told, the value of the land must have dropped. On top of that could the buyer not decide to move to the factory site instead of the ground if the ban on building has been removed?
Salford – Have planning permission and seem ahead at the minute however, there seems to be some problems with funding, haven’t heard a lot about Salford.
Also I’d like to point out I hope that the League is expanded instead of a team being dropped.
If this is the wrong place to post then sorry, but it seemed like a logical place for this type of post.
I'd also like to add my thanks to the people who made this happen.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
