financialtimes wrote:And there lies the issue with him, he can only be one of them at a time, not both, he cannot report as a journalist with that much bias, he has to be impartial and stick to "known facts" not make things up to suit the fans agenda. no problem him reporting "speculative" information, but he needs to make that clear and not imply them as facts

Luppylad wrote:Bradford in 3 weeks is going to be a very hard game there pack will be a match for ours no doubt about that hopefully rodwell and cozza are back by then

Trojan Horse wrote:Any odd job Bob can be a ‘journalist’ these days with a keyboard and too much time on their hands.

Social media is rife with pages of related content which is just copy and pasting a paragraph and filling it out with loads of pointless text.

My opinion is that social media should completely ban any form of freelance journalism except by officially recognised organisations or the clubs themselves.

Social media should just be what it was intended for to chat, meet and talk to friends and other people. Instead it’s become a playground for fake pages, people, profiles and media along with advertising to phish for data on personal users. It’s disgracefully unregulated and volatile.

1315trinity wrote:Spot on.
It's criminally misused and seemingly unaccountable.

financialtimes wrote:And there lies the issue with him, he can only be one of them at a time, not both, he cannot report as a journalist with that much bias, he has to be impartial and stick to "known facts" not make things up to suit the fans agenda. no problem him reporting "speculative" information, but he needs to make that clear and not imply them as facts

imwakefieldtillidie wrote:Gledhill isn't a journalist, never has been. He volunteers for a radio station, which he's actually pretty decent at considering he's an amateur. Everything else he just makes up.