Yes, right, should have been at least 160!
No, seriously, that's the right way to get things started, though I suspect we will get tougher opponents this season, somehow?
| WWW.RLFANS.COM https://rlfans.com/forums/ |
|
| Not a bad result. https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=592739 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | guess who [ Sun Mar 06, 2016 5:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Not a bad result. |
First league game. And a win. Scored 60 only let them score 4. Mind you. I bet some will still moan. |
|
| Author: | StephanieM [ Sun Mar 06, 2016 7:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Not a bad result. |
Yes, right, should have been at least 160! No, seriously, that's the right way to get things started, though I suspect we will get tougher opponents this season, somehow? |
|
| Author: | CountyDurhamCougar [ Wed Mar 09, 2016 12:12 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Not a bad result. |
Yes, it will be a bit tougher against Hull FC on Sunday. |
|
| Author: | Wilf Grimshaw [ Wed Mar 09, 2016 3:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Not a bad result. |
CountyDurhamCougar wrote:Yes, it will be a bit tougher against Hull FC on Sunday. Of the three Hull FC players that have played for the Dons, only one may be in our match squad. One is out for the compulsive seven days with concussion, the other one is in the Hull 19 for their game with Widnes. The betting suggests this is a banker home game for you, although IMO a good test for both sides in their effort to be promoted with Toulouse 
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|