WWW.RLFANS.COM https://rlfans.com/forums/ |
|
Wolves and Cougars? https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=562224 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | Lawkholme Len [ Mon Dec 09, 2013 4:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | Wolves and Cougars? |
Warrington Wolves are looking to tie up as dual registration with another club for the 2014 season! (League Weekly page 14). |
Author: | Rach [ Mon Dec 09, 2013 6:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wolves and Cougars? |
And why ....... ??? Problem is with Super League sides is that size/bulk is everything ..not skill. Clubs like Keighley can identify lads that dont get picked up because they do not follow the SL format ...you can develop size , game awareness and knowledge plus loyalty to your parent club ....that is is something completely different to what SL is all about at the mo ..... Buster , Olly , Sagar n Gav are perfect examples of this n we have some belting lads coming through ....all dedicated to the club ....and yes Im biased ..why the **** not...!! |
Author: | Leaguefan [ Mon Dec 09, 2013 6:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wolves and Cougars? |
One of the reasons why RL in this country is in the mess it is this inane dual reg system. No way would my employer go work for someone else in the same field at the same time. It benefits no one. It's time the SL clubs stumped for the teams they want their players to be involved with or just admit they don't give a hoot about development when a 2nd rate overseas crock is available and doesn't need HARD WORK to train/coach. |
Author: | StephanieM [ Mon Dec 09, 2013 8:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wolves and Cougars? |
Apart from the whole idea, and I'm not commenting on that, though I'm not as against it, as some on here! But from what I've seen on here, there are 2 SL clubs we seem to have some 'connection' to, and they are 1 of them. Wakefield obviously the other. So if we're considering it, then yes, Wolves would be a good choice. Just saying... Hides head in bomb shelter, looks out for flying shrapnel |
Author: | Lawkholme Len [ Tue Dec 10, 2013 4:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wolves and Cougars? |
Has to be said that DR with Warrington and Leeds didn't do Swinton and Hunslet a lot of good last season. York were DR with Hull FC. |
Author: | StephanieM [ Tue Dec 10, 2013 4:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wolves and Cougars? |
So overall, did any Championship sides benefit to any significant degree by DR? If so, who, in your opinion, and which SL side were they linked to? |
Author: | Hello Trouble! [ Wed Dec 11, 2013 8:56 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wolves and Cougars? |
StephanieM wrote:So overall, did any Championship sides benefit to any significant degree by DR? If so, who, in your opinion, and which SL side were they linked to? Batley benefited massively from Huddersfield last campaign if you ask me. |
Author: | Fax and furious [ Wed Dec 11, 2013 9:05 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wolves and Cougars? |
I know Tony Smith has a soft spot for Keighley and Mr March knows him well from their days at Huddersfield. Keighley should definitely go for it as a one off for this 2014 season only. Then stand on their own two feet after that. Key is finishing in the top 8 in 2014 and Keighley should take any help available to achieve that. |
Author: | guess who [ Wed Dec 11, 2013 12:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wolves and Cougars? |
It would only work for me if we had a load on injuries and we didnt have enough players left to make a team. Just putting players in to give them game time or get fit whilst dropping our players is not on. |
Author: | weighman [ Wed Dec 11, 2013 1:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wolves and Cougars? |
Doncaster had a falling out with Wakefield last season, this year we going with Hull FC. Hope that works out better ! Now we are under new owners it is hoped we (the Dons) will have our own structure below the 1st team . |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |