Andy Gilder wrote:All it does is add a different opinion to the piece and confuse the standing umpire.
If it is going to continue, it should be specific questions only - did it carry, did he hit it, where did it pitch etc - rather than matters of opinion.
That was initially what I thought it was for, was there an inside edge etc. It does seem to be causing controversy although most of the decisions seem to be right from what I have seen and from what the laws state.