Asim wrote:Of course Owen Coyle wasn't castigated by anyone for calling that tackle an "assault".
When Coyle has slagged off numerous opposition players while refusing to acknowledge similar behaviour from his own, I'm sure Coyle will receive similar castigation.
Still, at least Wenger isn't calling for a life ban this time, so I guess he's improving.
Joined: Mar 03 2004 Posts: 5308 Location: On a hill above Mold, North Wales
Asim wrote:I'd love to see how some of the posters on here would react if their teams were losing a player every season to this kind of tackle, given the hysterics smaller incidents often induce.
Wouldn't bother me, Everton regularly lose half their squad to season-ending injuries....
Joined: Oct 16 2002 Posts: 15284 Location: in the arsehole of the northwest that is Leigh
Asim wrote:I know Shawcross isn't "that type of player" (they never are ) but wasn't he the player who, for no apparent reason, put Adebayor into the stand when he was already off the pitch when Stoke played Arsenal last season?
I read an article a while back which said something like the myopia surrounding Wenger isn't from him, it's from "football fans" who go off on one whenever there is an incident surrounding Arsenal, usually attributing comments to him that he hasn't even made. He says a tackle is "unacceptable" and apparently this means everyone's sympathies should be with Shawcross. Odd, but then again I long ago realised that 95% of "football fans" are idiots.
I'd love to see how some of the posters on here would react if their teams were losing a player every season to this kind of tackle, given the hysterics smaller incidents often induce.
I know what your saying but why is it just Arsenal that suffer so many season ending injurys?
Stoke are a tough physical side but they don't just adopt that style of play when the play Arsenal i've seen them play that style everytime they play the other big clubs. The main difference i think is the coaching style of other clubs, teams like Nited, Liverfool and Chelski concentrate alot on player strength and power where as Wenger likes to go with fast lightweight players who are morelikely to come off worse in physical games. Would the outcome have been the same if it was Vermarlen, Cambell or Gallas?
Reg wrote:I'll tell you what pressure is. "Grand final, only seconds to go, and a field goal attempt with a split testicle and your shoes on the wrong feet."
He's neck scars proves he's lost his head Tevez, Tevez
He'll never have a sexy bird Tevez, Tevez
The argy lover, the ugly ****, they sewn his head on back to front
Carlos Tevez, herman munster head.
Just seen the Shawcross tackle on the weekly Premier League highlights show here. Difficult to see from first look what exactly happened, and of course it wasn't repeated, so I can't give much of my own personal opinion. However, the commentators here described it as (roughly translated) not a vicious / sinister foul, but rather a very hard challenge. Having said that, the tackling technique in the Bundesliga leaves a lot to be desired at times so I won't be taking their word for gospel.
Hope (and am sure) he'll make a fully recovery. Seems to be a great little player, with a lot of potential. Feel for Shawcross too. I guess that such incidents are unfortunately a part and parcel of contact sport. Thankfully he'll be in good hands and such injuries don't automatically signal the end of a career like they once may have.
Bądź bliski dla bliskich
ole ole ola nur der FCA, unser ganzes Leben, sind wir für dich da.
Enfield Exile wrote:A couple of questions for United fans:
Why use blue and yellow balloons for your 'green and gold' campaign?
Do you not think the "green and gold" campaign is rather lame? After all, wearing a Norwich scarf (while underneath your jackets you are sporting a red replica shirt) and then handing £40 to the Smurfs is not a 'protest' with any substance, is it?
Out of interest, what happens to the money raised by those selling the yellow and green merchandise? Were those involved in starting the campaign, also selling the merchandise?
I see what you're saying, but from a neutral's POV I can see the other side of the arguement - if the fans simply stopped paying their money and attending, there'd be another 10 fans waiting in the wings to take their seat. It's the nature of a big club. At least whilst they have the opportunity to attend matches, they can make their feelings known to the owners. Something which wouldn't happen if they stopped attending, and the 'football tourists' took their places.
How effective this campaign will be remains to be seen. I suspect, not so effective. Manchester United is such a massive club and product, and there's enough people out there with more money than sense that they'll never have a problem putting bums on seats as long as they're challenging for trophies.
Bądź bliski dla bliskich
ole ole ola nur der FCA, unser ganzes Leben, sind wir für dich da.
Pawelek wrote:I see what you're saying, but from a neutral's POV I can see the other side of the arguement - if the fans simply stopped paying their money and attending, there'd be another 10 fans waiting in the wings to take their seat. It's the nature of a big club. At least whilst they have the opportunity to attend matches, they can make their feelings known to the owners. Something which wouldn't happen if they stopped attending, and the 'football tourists' took their places.
How effective this campaign will be remains to be seen. I suspect, not so effective. Manchester United is such a massive club and product, and there's enough people out there with more money than sense that they'll never have a problem putting bums on seats as long as they're challenging for trophies.
If there truly is such a pent-up demand for MU tickets that a boycott would be ineffective because tourists would just buy up the tickets anyway, basically the Glazer's are never going to sell up. Why would you sell up when you have a licence to print money? A licence that will print money even though the "customers" cannot stand the fact they're giving you money.
If MUST cannot organize a proper boycott of a game, then really they should pack up, STFU and either bugger off to FCUM or accept they are the Glazers' bitches.
IMO a boycott can work. If the strength of feeling truly is there. But that does mean a sacrifice. Not just looking like a divvy Norwich fan. They've got to forfeit watching a match they've paid for with their season tickets. That way no tourist will be sitting in their seat. It'll mean all the people who would normally buy a match ticket not bothering. It'll mean persuading the tourists to make their yearly excursion another game, and not their target game.
If they do have the cash to buy the club, and they can arrange an effective boycott of a game/s, then they might achieve their goal and take back the club. They aren't going to do it with green/gold scarves alone though. But I do think the green and gold scarves are a very good start. It's just a question of whether they are willing to carry it on.
flipper wrote:good to see the 'one trick pony' pick up MOM in the cup final yesterday, terrible purchase as mentioned.
One swallow... His major contribution was crossing with his head down. He simply put it back into the box. name me a winger who couldn't do that?
I didn't say he was a one-trick pony. I simply said that there are a lot of players better than him. I guess you wouldn't have disagreed until he joined the team that you attach yourself to.
If we can go on one game, then Nigel De Jong is better than lampard and Essien combined as he dominated the Chelsea midfield in the game at CoM this season. Extending that logic further...Vidic is rubbish because Torres has a habit of embarrassing him.
Lord God Jose Mourinho wrote:IMO a boycott can work.
A boycott will only work of it reduces United's income to the point that they cant pay the interest. In the short term they are more likely to respond to that by selling Rooney rather than selling out at a reduced price.
The Glazers would be concerned if the long term value of the club were to be undermined but everyone knows that the fans will return when the club is sold, as it undoubtedly will be at some point. Hence a boycott would have very little impact on the sale price of the club.
Cibaman wrote:A boycott will only work of it reduces United's income to the point that they cant pay the interest. In the short term they are more likely to respond to that by selling Rooney rather than selling out at a reduced price.
I don't think the aim of a boycott should be to buy the club at a reduced price. The aim of a boycott should be to persuade the Glazers to accept fair market value for the club, which will give the Glazers a profit of a few hundred million for their ownership of the club.
I think if anything was to persuade MU supporters to totally go against the Glazers, it would be the slightest hint that they were willing to sell Rooney. Ronaldo was different, he wanted to go and MU got fantastic money for him. But to even hint at selling Rooney, who hasn't given the slightest indication he wants to go, would be the most stupid thing the Glazers could do.
Quote:The Glazers would be concerned if the long term value of the club were to be undermined but everyone knows that the fans will return when the club is sold, as it undoubtedly will be at some point. Hence a boycott would have very little impact on the sale price of the club.
The Glazers won't care about the long term value of the club if they are getting a massive profit now.
One "soft" boycott of a PL game, one where only 40,000 people turn up, could be enough to persuade the Glazers to accept a fair offer for the club. A boycott shows and a fair offer on the table shows serious intent to buy the club. 40,000 people wearing Norwich City scarves while the stadium is still full every week is just a futile gesture IMO.
There's supposed to be a statement from the "Red Knights" today.
Joined: Oct 15 2003 Posts: 53839 Location: North Yorkshire
Asim wrote:While all other football managers point out any previous misdemeanors by their players when commenting on something that happens to one of theirs?
While most other managers don't claim that other teams go out to hurt their players and moan about awful challenges that were nothing of the sort. Wenger has turned into an Art form.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 60 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum