You are surely taking the p1$$? Its going nowhere near his face. Even if it was going near his face that doesn't mean it wouldn't have glanced off his head and still gone in. Which is exactly why he "saved" it. Its the most blatant of red cards I've ever seen. To say he didn't deny a goalscoring opportunity is crackpottery of the highest order.

I get the feeling he was using the argument as some sort of bizarre justification for not bringing in goal-line technology.

Why would they have needed goal-line technology for the incident last night?

One already.

1-0 to the Krauts.....dont know what keeper was upto....terrible positioning.

The Germans are tearing the Argies a new one at the moment.

Certainly didn't cover himself in glory there did he.

Exactly my thinking. The term used was actually video technology. But if it is brought in, I think it should be just goal-line technology, not a video ref as such.

Didnt cover anything lol.

Was too far back and not central...tbh he could have come for that.

Should be 2 nil