WWW.RLFANS.COM
https://rlfans.com/forums/

So, who is going to be cited by the RL ?
https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=28&t=401831		 Page 1 of 10
Author:  pie eater and proud of it [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:23 pm ]
Post subject:  So, who is going to be cited by the RL ?
Mason needs citing, he ran 30 yeards and smashed Harrison Hansen in the head from behind ! Total coward !

Hock possibly needs citing, he ran 20 yards in the other fight to knock someone over, think it was Wild.

The ref had no control of the players tonight, absolute joke.

I think there will be repercussions from Red Hall.
Author:  XBrettKennyX [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:28 pm ]
Post subject: 
The biggest joke of all ARE Red Hall.


Best game in the world run by retards.
Author:  GIANT DAZ [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: So, who is going to be cited by the RL ?
pie eater and proud of it wrote:Mason needs citing, he ran 30 yeards and smashed Harrison Hansen in the head from behind ! Total coward !

Hock possibly needs citing, he ran 20 yards in the other fight to knock someone over, think it was Wild.

The ref had no control of the players tonight, absolute joke.

I think there will be repercussions from Red Hall.


haha , so Mason NEEDS citing for running in and fighting but Hock POSSIBLY needs citing for doing the same ???? :roll:
Author:  JudgeB [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:30 pm ]
Post subject: 
Will be interesting to see.
After all Leeds have scrapped in almost every game this year and survived without copping a ban.
But that's the RFL for you!
Author:  loobyfromorrell [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: So, who is going to be cited by the RL ?
GIANT DAZ wrote:haha , so Mason NEEDS citing for running in and fighting but Hock POSSIBLY needs citing for doing the same ???? :roll:


If you read the post, running in from 30 yards as opposed to 20 yards. Up to 25 yards is generally regarded as acceptable :wink:
Author:  pie eater and proud of it [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: So, who is going to be cited by the RL ?
loobyfromorrell wrote:If you read the post, running in from 30 yards as opposed to 20 yards. Up to 25 yards is generally regarded as acceptable :wink:


Yeah damn right :D

Seriously though the 2 incidents weren't the same gravity of offence in my opinion.

Masons was a cowardly attack on someone from behind who was already taking punches from the front !!
Author:  ABP' [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:44 pm ]
Post subject: 
Keith Mason struck somebody from behind, what punishment does usually acquire?

He didn't have an excuse to do it either.
Author:  Catalancs [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: So, who is going to be cited by the RL ?
GIANT DAZ wrote:haha , so Mason NEEDS citing for running in and fighting


glad you agree
Author:  wiganrlforever [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:47 pm ]
Post subject: 
Alex BP' wrote:Keith Mason struck somebody from behind, what punishment does usually acquire?

He didn't have an excuse to do it either.


All the Officials missed the Mason Coward attack, what a sh*thou*e
Author:  Catalancs [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:51 pm ]
Post subject: 
wiganrlforever wrote:All the Officials missed the Mason Coward attack, what a sh*thou*e


the same keith mason who fractured jamie peacock's eye socket pre-season?
Page 1 of 10 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/