Oh dear, bring back Mathers and Smith. Hudds up to 3rd and Wigan down in lowly 9th.
| WWW.RLFANS.COM https://rlfans.com/forums/ |
|
| Were you bad or Hudds good, or both? https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=28&t=401823 |
Page 1 of 6 |
| Author: | Saint Simon [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Were you bad or Hudds good, or both? |
Hudds seem to be up and down, did you catch them on a good day (for them)? |
|
| Author: | Rughead [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Oh dear, bring back Mathers and Smith. Hudds up to 3rd and Wigan down in lowly 9th.
|
|
| Author: | the ditch [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
nosey bleeder......... 
|
|
| Author: | ArcticGorilla [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
wigan dominated most of the game, and bentham was disgracefull! it was very nip and tuck, 2 points in it going into the 78th min hudds bagged 2 tries at the end which i cant argue with, but wigan did not take the chances, IMO wigan should of come away with points from the games but - ey, you dont take chances, you dont score points, you dont win HERE WAS A GREAT PUNCH UP IN IT! OFF THE BALL HANSEN AND NO.10, 10 SECONDS OF 1V1 BRAWLING FOLLOWED BY FIST FLYING EVERYWERE, When it all seemed to have calmed down, one player throws another punch at it all re-kicks off |
|
| Author: | ArcticGorilla [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
~ No1 Saints Fan ~ wrote:Oh dear, bring back Mathers and Smith. Hudds up to 3rd and Wigan down in lownly 9th.
not as lonley as leon is his cold dark cell
|
|
| Author: | RICHARD5LEGEND [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Both teams were sh*t. Added to that a ref who didnt once have control of the game, was just a terrible game 
|
|
| Author: | XBrettKennyX [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Tomkins ............. it had to happen. Rubbish game. If he learns from it then it's not a problem. Ainscough. Has had instances before where he was exposed. Should learn from it. Most worrying thing is that despite possession, Wigan failed to capitalise. Still. The cup games don't start until September. Who cares about this result? |
|
| Author: | Abacus [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
DannyRic wrote:not as lonley as leon is his cold dark cell
Don't worry Leon won't be lonely - he'll have a special 20 stone friend called Bubba for bedtime cuddles |
|
| Author: | XBrettKennyX [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
~ No1 Saints Fan ~ wrote:Oh dear, bring back Mathers and Smith. Hudds up to 3rd and Wigan down in lowly 9th.
You mean 1 place away from a playoff spot? Would YOU choose Wigan as your opponents come September? Now truthfully? |
|
| Author: | jonh [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
XBrettKennyX wrote:Tomkins ............. it had to happen. Rubbish game.
If he learns from it then it's not a problem. Ainscough. Has had instances before where he was exposed. Should learn from it. Most worrying thing is that despite possession, Wigan failed to capitalise. Still. The cup games don't start until September. Who cares about this result? Was not at the game, but every report i have heard thus far has been very critical of another poor performance. i do not understand the mentality of being happy to follow a 4 week team, if we make the 8 as we are realistically looking at 10th at the moment, which is not good enough with this squad. |
|
| Page 1 of 6 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|