Can anyone remember if his court case was treated in the same way as that of certain Saints and Warrington players?
Newsnight 13th May 2010: "With the role of Deputy Prime Minister a non-job. Has Nick Clegg gone from King Maker to tea maker????"
I kept the faith and I kept voting Not for the iron fist but for the helping hand For theirs is a land with a wall around it And mine is a faith in my fellow man Theirs is a land of hope and glory Mine is the green field and the factory floor Theirs are the skies all dark with bombers And mine is the peace we knew Between the wars
Joined: Jul 29 2002 Posts: 2840 Location: wishing and hoping
Donna wrote:Can anyone remember if his court case was treated in the same way as that of certain Saints and Warrington players?
was it eck I cant believe how mard the boards are being. Our board was full of it including several mods off other boards having a go
Doogal McQuire. wrote:The perception with everyone from outside the Rugby League Community is that Wigan are still the biggest name in British rugby league.
It is a hard pill to swallow but unbelievably true.
It's ALWAYS the same when it's a Saints player, with the Saints mafia playing mum and dad.
Newsnight 13th May 2010: "With the role of Deputy Prime Minister a non-job. Has Nick Clegg gone from King Maker to tea maker????"
I kept the faith and I kept voting Not for the iron fist but for the helping hand For theirs is a land with a wall around it And mine is a faith in my fellow man Theirs is a land of hope and glory Mine is the green field and the factory floor Theirs are the skies all dark with bombers And mine is the peace we knew Between the wars
And the sub-justice thing is daft. Sub-justice is in to prevent members of a jury being swayed by media opinion. So in a case with no jury and with a judge who has already stated the a custodial outcome is likely where does a fans forum get to make any impact?
Joined: Apr 01 2003 Posts: 1423 Location: Dear Old Blighty
alanpdodd wrote:And the sub-justice thing is daft. Sub-justice is in to prevent members of a jury being swayed by media opinion. So in a case with no jury and with a judge who has already stated the a custodial outcome is likely where does a fans forum get to make any impact?
The sub judice rule applies up until sentencing. This is quite apart from the libel laws which is for the protection of everyone, criminals included. It is wise not to comment, so the admin are doing what they should do.
Joined: Jan 27 2005 Posts: 2687 Location: Westhoughton
loobyfromorrell wrote:The sub judice rule applies up until sentencing. This is quite apart from the libel laws which is for the protection of everyone, criminals included. It is wise not to comment, so the admin are doing what they should do.
Looking at the original post i real don't see anything wrong with it . Their was a link to a newspaper article and a small passage from the article no one said anything that was not already printed in the press. And no one made comments on anything that did or did not happen. Their was a lot more said about Feka and that did not get locked so quickly.
Best Wigan No7 ever [b]Terry Newton Wigan legend RIP[/b]
Its not a case of the mods/admin being trigger happy. You wouldnt believe the amount of times people have tried to close these forums down. If we want to keep it, we have to abide by the AUP rules.
tommyfromhull wrote:Wigan are quickly turning into the Wigan of old - Arrogant and think they are invincible.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
