WWW.RLFANS.COM
https://rlfans.com/forums/

Your team for Bradford
https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=28&t=397313
Page 1 of 8

Author:  Meyt N Prater Pie [ Mon Mar 02, 2009 12:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Your team for Bradford

I may get shot down here, I may not

1 Pat Richards
2 Amos Roberts
3 Phil Bailey
4 George Carmont
5 Sean Ainscough
6 Tim Smith
7 Tommy Leuluai
8 Eamon O'Carroll
9 Michael McIlorum
10 Stuart Fielden
11 Harrison Hansen
12 Joel Tomkins
13 Sean O'Loughlin

14 Gareth Hock
15 Paul Prescott
16 Feka
17 Sam Tomkins


No place for Riddell, Phelps, Daryl, Coley, Karl Pryce or Mathers. None of em deserve to play right now.

Author:  FAXE LUCAS [ Mon Mar 02, 2009 12:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Your team for Bradford

Meyt N Prater Pie wrote:I may get shot down here, I may not

1 Pat Richards
2 Amos Roberts
3 Phil Bailey
4 George Carmont
5 Sean Ainscough
6 Tim Smith
7 Tommy Leuluai
8 Eamon O'Carroll
9 Michael McIlorum
10 Stuart Fielden
11 Harrison Hansen
12 Joel Tomkins
13 Sean O'Loughlin

14 Gareth Hock
15 Paul Prescott
16 Feka
17 Sam Tomkins


No place for Riddell, Phelps, Daryl, Coley, Karl Pryce or Mathers. None of em deserve to play right now.


sounds good to me

Author:  RB [ Mon Mar 02, 2009 12:57 pm ]
Post subject: 

Spot on imo.

Author:  Nick NJ [ Mon Mar 02, 2009 12:59 pm ]
Post subject: 

Seems ok to me, the only issue is riddell who i think needs more game time but it's catch 22 with him at the min.

Author:  jinkin jimmy [ Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:00 pm ]
Post subject: 

RB wrote:Spot on imo.


I'd go with Pryce instead of Roberts. Another non-performing, expensive import. Pryce wasn't great against Cas but was far from awful.

Author:  Meyt N Prater Pie [ Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:00 pm ]
Post subject: 

NickNJ wrote:Seems ok to me, the only issue is riddell who i think needs more game time but it's catch 22 with him at the min.



RESERVES

Author:  MadDogg [ Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:01 pm ]
Post subject: 

Diasgree, I seem to be in the minority here but I thought Riddell went pretty well against Quins and with time he'll improve much more.

Richards
Roberts
Bailey
Carmont
Ainscough
Leuluai
Smith
Fielden
Riddell
O'Carroll
Hock
Tomkins
O'Loughlin

Feka
Hansen
Prescott
Tomkins

Author:  MadDogg [ Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:02 pm ]
Post subject: 

jinkin jimmy wrote:I'd go with Pryce instead of Roberts. Another non-performing, expensive import.


What on earth..

Author:  LondonRobster [ Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:05 pm ]
Post subject: 

I agree Pryce should not play due to fitness but saying he does not deserve to play sounds a tad harsh.

He's done nothing wrong has he?

Carried the water like a pro Saturday. :wink: When is he fit for playing, anyone know? If fit I'd shove him in at Centre for Bailey.

Author:  RB [ Mon Mar 02, 2009 1:07 pm ]
Post subject: 

LondonRobster wrote:I agree Pryce should not play due to fitness but saying he does not deserve to play sounds a tad harsh.

He's done nothing wrong has he?

Carried the water like a pro Saturday. :wink: When is he fit for playing, anyone know? If fit I'd shove him in at Centre for Bailey.


Pryce played against Castleford and looked about 60% fit at the most.

Page 1 of 8 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/