WWW.RLFANS.COM https://rlfans.com/forums/ |
|
Team for Bradford. https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=28&t=397090 |
Page 1 of 3 |
Author: | NSW [ Sun Mar 01, 2009 10:49 am ] |
Post subject: | Team for Bradford. |
Well we're off the mark now we gotta kick on What would be everyones team for next week? 1.)Richards 2.)Roberts 3.)Bailey 4.)Carmont 5.)Ainscough 6.)S.Tomkins 7.)Tommy 8.)Fielden 9.)Riddell 10.)O'Carroll 11.)Hansen 12.)Lockers 13.)J.Tomkins 14.)Feka 15.)Hock 16.)Prescott(if fully fit) if not Coley 17.)Smith/Macca That would be mine. |
Author: | kirkamania6 [ Sun Mar 01, 2009 10:53 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Team for Bradford. |
fazwigan4eva wrote:Well we're off the mark now we gotta kick on
What would be everyones team for next week? 1.)Richards 2.)Roberts 3.)Bailey 4.)Carmont 5.)Ainscough 6.)S.Tomkins 7.)Tommy 8.)Fielden 9.)Riddell 10.)O'Carroll 11.)Hansen 12.)Lockers 13.)J.Tomkins 14.)Feka 15.)Hock 16.)Prescott(if fully fit) if not Coley 17.)Smith/Macca That would be mine. Macca starting with Piggy on the bench for me otherwise spot on I don't think any of us are realisticly expecting that side though |
Author: | NSW [ Sun Mar 01, 2009 10:55 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Team for Bradford. |
kirkamania6 wrote:Macca starting with Piggy on the bench for me otherwise spot on
I don't think any of us are realisticly expecting that side though :( I expected Mathers to play last night and Sam not to play, so there is hope |
Author: | Andy Greg [ Sun Mar 01, 2009 10:57 am ] |
Post subject: | |
1.)Richards 2.)Roberts 3.)Bailey 4.)Carmont 5.)Ainscough 6.)Smith 7.)Tommy 8.)Fielden 9.)Riddell 10.)O'Carroll 11.)Hansen 12.)Lockers 13.)J.Tomkins 14.)Feka 15.)Hock 16.)Mossop 17.)Sam Tomkins Thats what i would go with |
Author: | kirkamania6 [ Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:00 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Andy Greg wrote:1.)Richards
2.)Roberts 3.)Bailey 4.)Carmont 5.)Ainscough 6.)Smith 7.)Tommy 8.)Fielden 9.)Riddell 10.)O'Carroll 11.)Hansen 12.)Lockers 13.)J.Tomkins 14.)Feka 15.)Hock 16.)Mossop 17.)Sam Tomkins Thats what i would go with The next Shaun Edwards only on the bench |
Author: | Rogues Gallery [ Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:01 am ] |
Post subject: | |
As much as I don't rate Coley, I wouldn't drop him after yesterdays performance. So I'd go with the same 17as yesterday, but have Hock on the bench and Hansen starting. |
Author: | NSW [ Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:02 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Andy Greg wrote:1.)Richards
2.)Roberts 3.)Bailey 4.)Carmont 5.)Ainscough 6.)Smith 7.)Tommy 8.)Fielden 9.)Riddell 10.)O'Carroll 11.)Hansen 12.)Lockers 13.)J.Tomkins 14.)Feka 15.)Hock 16.)Mossop 17.)Sam Tomkins Thats what i would go with I would take Prescott over Mossop tbh. However Mossop over Coley, even though i thought Coley did alright last night. |
Author: | Andy Greg [ Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:09 am ] |
Post subject: | |
fazwigan4eva wrote:I would take Prescott over Mossop tbh. However Mossop over Coley, even though i thought Coley did alright last night.
I thought Prescott was not fit or he would have been there |
Author: | Andy Greg [ Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:11 am ] |
Post subject: | |
kirkamania6 wrote:The next Shaun Edwards only on the bench
Would bring him on as we did yesterday at about the 30 min mark and let him play the rest of the game after 3 or 4 games to get up to full speed then he would be in the starting 17. |
Author: | kirkamania6 [ Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:13 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Andy Greg wrote:Would bring him on as we did yesterday at about the 30 min mark and let him play the rest of the game after 3 or 4 games to get up to full speed then he would be in the starting 17.
I predicted your reasons was just joking with you |
Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |