WWW.RLFANS.COM
https://rlfans.com/forums/

Team for Castleford
https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=28&t=394630		 Page 1 of 11
Author:  kirkamania6 [ Sat Feb 14, 2009 4:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Team for Castleford
Mathers, Phelps, Riddell, Bailey all may be out so I would go for ..

1. Richards
2. Ainscough
3. Goulding
4. Carmont
5. Roberts
6. S Tomkins
7. Smith
8. Fielden
9. Leuluai
10. O'Carroll
11. Hansen
12. O'Loughlin
13. J Tomkins

14. Feka
15. Prescott
16. Hock
17. McIlorum

However I know this very unlikely to be the side as Coley will probably return in place of Prescott, Sam will be on the bench if at all and Lockers will more than likely play at Loose

Thoughts?
Author:  AJ [ Sat Feb 14, 2009 5:34 pm ]
Post subject: 
Amos
Phelps/Ainscough
Goulding
Carmont
Richards
O'Loughlin
Smith
Fielden
Tommy
O'Carroll
Hansen
Bailey/Hock
Joel

Prescott
Feka
McIllorum/Sam
Hock/Mossop

We need to give Riddell time to get fit. O'Loughlin @ 6 isn't perfect but we need to start this game well and Tommy is outstanding at 9.

I expect Bailey to be fit, it Phelps isn't then Ainscough comes in.
Author:  RB [ Sat Feb 14, 2009 5:51 pm ]
Post subject: 
If Riddell is out then either Tommy has to play 80 minutes at 9 or Tomkins will come in I assume.
Author:  RICHARD5LEGEND [ Sat Feb 14, 2009 6:10 pm ]
Post subject: 
Roberts
Ainscough
Goulding
Carmont
Richards
Tomkins
Smith
Fielden
Tommy
O'Carroll
Hansen
Tomkins
Lockers

Hock
Feka
Prescott
McIlorum

Just go for it with the youngsters, thats 10 of the 17 from our academy, and its still a strong team, imo its stronger than what we played yesterday - gets rid of the deadwood like bailey and phelps.
Author:  AJ [ Sat Feb 14, 2009 6:20 pm ]
Post subject: 
Mother Feka wrote:gets rid of the deadwood like bailey and phelps.


To call them deadwood is simpily going over the top because they have aussie accents.

Phelps is better than Goudling, swap the accents around and nobody would care that Phelps was picked ahead of him.

If people didnt think they knew what Bailey earned he wouldnt be a target either.
Author:  NSW [ Sat Feb 14, 2009 6:35 pm ]
Post subject: 
AJ wrote:If people didnt think they knew what Bailey earned he wouldnt be a target either.


I agree with that but i also think he should be our 5th choice back rower behind Hock,Lockers, Tomkins and Hansen.
Author:  RICHARD5LEGEND [ Sat Feb 14, 2009 6:53 pm ]
Post subject: 
AJ wrote:To call them deadwood is simpily going over the top because they have aussie accents.

Phelps is better than Goudling, swap the accents around and nobody would care that Phelps was picked ahead of him.

If people didnt think they knew what Bailey earned he wouldnt be a target either.


Phelps is not better than goulding.

What does Bailey offer that Hansen, Hock, O'Loughlin, Tomkins, Mossop, Farrell, or Flanagan dont?

I'd also add Coley to the deadwood list and he doesnt have an Australian accent.
Author:  Catalancs [ Sat Feb 14, 2009 7:58 pm ]
Post subject: 
what gets me is that noble knew riddell and bailey weren't match fit, yet he still played them!
Author:  Father Ted [ Sat Feb 14, 2009 8:38 pm ]
Post subject:  rl
Richards, Roberts, Goulding, Carmont, Ainscough, Smith, Leuluai, Fielden, McIlorum, Coley, O'Loughlin, Hock, J Tomkins.
Feka, Prescott, O'Carroll & S Tomkins.

That's assuming that Bailey nor Riddell are not fit next week and Smith is. I wouldn't pick Phelps even if he was and Coley must realise that Castleford for him is a chance to put a bad match behind him and come up with a good performace. Lockers is more suited to the 2nd row and Joel could do with a start at 13.
Author:  AJ [ Sat Feb 14, 2009 9:14 pm ]
Post subject: 
Mother Feka wrote:Phelps is not better than goulding.


Yes he is, he is quicker, can pass better and finish a move. As for defence, both are poor

Mother Feka wrote:What does Bailey offer that Hansen, Hock, O'Loughlin, Tomkins, Mossop, Farrell, or Flanagan dont?


To compare Mossop, Farrell or Flanagan is silly.

He offers exactly the same as Hansen. Hock & Locky are different kinds of players.
Page 1 of 11 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/