WWW.RLFANS.COM
https://rlfans.com/forums/

Bailey
https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=28&t=394398		 Page 1 of 2
Author:  Ashton Bears [ Fri Feb 13, 2009 2:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Bailey
Super league stats second top tackler for last weekend pitty he cant run forward would still have Hanson second row with Lockers, Tomkins loose forward
Author:  Jukesays [ Fri Feb 13, 2009 2:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bailey
Ashton Bears wrote:Super league stats second top tackler for last weekend pitty he cant run forward would still have Hanson second row with Lockers, Tomkins loose forward


:SLEEPY:
Author:  [Gareth] [ Fri Feb 13, 2009 2:12 pm ]
Post subject: 
hasnt this been covered in about 6 other threads this week?
Author:  dany1979 [ Fri Feb 13, 2009 4:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bailey
Ashton Bears wrote:Super league stats second top tackler for last weekend pitty he cant run forward would still have Hanson second row with Lockers, Tomkins loose forward


His defence is very good, ive not looked at the stats but he does graft for the team and when he played in the centres, although he didnt offer much in attack he did prove to be solid enough to do a decent job although to put it into perspective cost wise Nathan Mcavoy was brought in short term by Noble to do a similar job out wide.

The oversea's spots should be used to bring in players that can offer something more than what we already have at the club and i agree with you in saying that other players can do a similar job....and probably for less money too.
Author:  RB [ Fri Feb 13, 2009 4:58 pm ]
Post subject: 
Super League stats also say Riddell made something like 22 metres. Surely that isn't right. :shock:
Author:  p1e e8ter [ Fri Feb 13, 2009 5:00 pm ]
Post subject: 
RB wrote:Super League stats also say Riddell made something like 22 metres. Surely that isn't right. :shock:


I can't remember him running very much from dummy half so maybe it is.
Author:  jinkin jimmy [ Fri Feb 13, 2009 5:02 pm ]
Post subject: 
p1e e8ter wrote:I can't remember him running very much from dummy half so maybe it is.


IIRC he ran twice. I've already convinced myself he was injured.....
Author:  dany1979 [ Fri Feb 13, 2009 5:04 pm ]
Post subject: 
jinkin jimmy wrote:IIRC he ran twice. I've already convinced myself he was injured.....


Really that bad?

Ive not seen any coverage of the game, didnt get to see much Rugby in Egypt.

The game sounded dire.
Author:  jonh [ Fri Feb 13, 2009 5:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Bailey
dany1979 wrote:His defence is very good, ive not looked at the stats but he does graft for the team and when he played in the centres, although he didnt offer much in attack he did prove to be solid enough to do a decent job although to put it into perspective cost wise Nathan Mcavoy was brought in short term by Noble to do a similar job out wide.

The oversea's spots should be used to bring in players that can offer something more than what we already have at the club and i agree with you in saying that other players can do a similar job....and probably for less money too.


I really have to disagree, he is hard working yes but his defence is only good if players run straight at him, if one runs a wide line he is screwed.

Also is it suprising he is up there for tackles made? We spilled the ball all day and gave it to them on a plate they dominated posession.

He missed 2 tackles both of which were in the build up to the Trinity tries. Hardly impressive for a so called good defender.
Author:  Pemps [ Fri Feb 13, 2009 5:14 pm ]
Post subject: 
dany1979 wrote:Really that bad?

Ive not seen any coverage of the game, didnt get to see much Rugby in Egypt.

The game sounded dire.


Yup. Comparable to the Wakey, Huddersfield and HKR games last season.
Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/