BoredWiganer wrote:Fair play for coming back Jonh and saying that.
I said initially that from what i have seen of Farrimond he has a good running game and step, but even though that was London, that was more impressive than i could have possibly expected. Tonight has cemented my thoughts that a partnership of Smith and Farimond could definitely work, for our needs now if Peet feels he is ready for the prolonged exposure but more critically for in the future.
I will also be fair with Hampshire as i have been critical of his recent performances. He was much better last night, had a role to play as the rock of the side, and he did a great job of it too with a few nice touches of the ball sprinkled in. Credit where credit is due.
I thought Hampshire and Walters were both awful again.
Farrimond is (another) exceptional talent coming through our system. If Field is out for a few more weeks and we have the 3 games in a week coming up then he may get an extended run. Wardle and Leeming came off with knocks so possibly Keighran comes back into centre and Ecky moves to his natural side with a run out for Forber.
jonh wrote:My initial comment was in regard to who replaces Field now.
If we pair Farrimond as he is at this moment in time with Smith and run with French at 1 I think we will have issues and lose strike.
My point was I don’t think they work now or rather we have more effective ways of solving the issue.
For me Smith and French need to play 7 & 6.
We need to test other options over moving French to 1 before pairing Smith and Farrimond at the current time.
There is no other option in my view, we are far more cohesive, and dangerous, as a team when Smith and French are 6 and 7. As you say the only debate should be, who plays fullback.
bazdev wrote:I thought Hampshire and Walters were both awful again.
I think awful is a strong term but I would agree they were average. Mind you the team as a whole didn't get out of second gear. I am looking forward to seeing us ramp it up over the next few weeks.
Zig wrote:I think awful is a strong term but I would agree they were average. Mind you the team as a whole didn't get out of second gear. I am looking forward to seeing us ramp it up over the next few weeks.
Yeah, your probably right. Hampshire for me just doesn't impose himself on the game and I was expecting to see more from him yesterday but other than doing the majority of kicking he was anonymous again. Walters hasn't settled in properly yet but his carries have no conviction. I was excited by his signing but have been underwhelmed so far although their is itigation with changing sides most weeks since the injury
bazdev wrote:Yeah, your probably right. Hampshire for me just doesn't impose himself on the game and I was expecting to see more from him yesterday but other than doing the majority of kicking he was anonymous again. Walters hasn't settled in properly yet but his carries have no conviction. I was excited by his signing but have been underwhelmed so far although their is itigation with changing sides most weeks since the injury
I think that is fair enough. Walters needs to find some of Juniors aggression. He is a big unit and can do untold damage. I’m not convinced his position is playing out wide though. As for Rocky, I think the experiment of playing him at 6 and Bevan at 1 should be over, it dilutes our attack. We need to find a temporary replacement for Jai and put French in the position where the opposition fear him.
I wouldn’t have been opposed giving Keighran a go as a running steady 6 like he played a lot for Catalan but the Wardle injury might scupper that
RICHARDS IS SUPERMAN!!!!
Wire_91 wrote:its your first final in about 8 years and now you ravin and rantin about it F**k off, and ill be going old trafford tomoz cheering on the saints and ill be writing on this forum givin you loads of shi* when your drying you eyes and the wire fan will be here handing out the tissues in the thousands, thats if you do take that many fans cause now it looks like its your fans who have jumped on the band wagon now your in a final, this time last year there was only 1000 people in the jjb and now its fillin up cause youve won the league hahaha proper true supporters you are
bazdev wrote:Yeah, your probably right. Hampshire for me just doesn't impose himself on the game and I was expecting to see more from him yesterday but other than doing the majority of kicking he was anonymous again.
Isn't that why we got rid of him first time round? Going away & improving your game is one thing & I think he was out to impress when he first arrived back. But it really does look like old, bad habits have crept back in. Ok in bursts, then seems to go missing for large periods. Maybe Peet can whisper in his shell-like & stick a wasp up where it'll motivate a little.
Zig wrote:There is no other option in my view, we are far more cohesive, and dangerous, as a team when Smith and French are 6 and 7. As you say the only debate should be, who plays fullback.
I thought the same but this game showed the best option is Smith and Farrimond with French at 1 for me.
Who should play fullback if not French?
Also I thought Hampshire was a lot better in this game taking on Smith's role. Unfortunately that's not really what we need atm.
Simba16 wrote:Farrimond is (another) exceptional talent coming through our system. If Field is out for a few more weeks and we have the 3 games in a week coming up then he may get an extended run. Wardle and Leeming came off with knocks so possibly Keighran comes back into centre and Ecky moves to his natural side with a run out for Forber.
Forber himself is injured. A shame for the lad because he may have got a run if Leeming is out for any length of time.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
