XBrettKennyX wrote:I really AM tired now and am loathe to post.
However, you make it so easy for me.
Coaches are judged on 1 thing. RESULTS.
To suggest otherwise is in the best case naiive.
No coaches are judged wrongly purely on results by uneducated fans, chairmen, media. Get a group of coaches / players / educted RL fans to tell you how to judge coaches properly and they will use the 2 factors that I gave you.
When you judge coaches purely on results it is wrong. It gives rise to annual sackings and instability. However, if you want to judge coaches by results then please explain why Noble is still here because if you use results as a measure then Davo O has shown That Noble is taking Wigan RL backwards. You cannot have it both ways. If you want to go the results route then you have to accept Dave O's analysis.
I look deeper than that but clearly;
IL had major issues with the playing side in 2008
The fans had major issues with the playing side in 2008
A section of Wiganers became ex fans, not attending games in 2008
You say results? Why was Brian Smith not sacked by Newcastle, why was Neil Henry not sacked by Canberra and actually chased by other clubs?
We have had stability and yet we are going backwards. So what has stability achieved at Wigan RLFC? I believe in stability personally so something must be wrong?