Now that really would be supposition



Dave

But unlike your Suppositions DaveO, His would be Correct!

Dave is right though none is fact is all ifs and buts and in a lot of cases hoping. Lets leave it to IL he knows best and he can be trusted afterall we got Gleeson for £30k as thats what we had on the cap

Dave is not right though, because by your definition all he offered was ifs and buts as well.





Sorry, I hate using the eye-rolling icon - it's so pompous. But while you used it for others, I thought it only fair to use it for you. After all, you deserved it at least as much as they did.

Can you back this up? Justify your comments?

They can't be justified on the strength of his time at Wigan thus far, but they can be on the strength of his NRL career, which was pretty impressive. He's not that old either.

I think we should be patient with Mark Riddell. There's every chance he'll come good for us.

Least thats not ifs and buts eh

Like it or not, there are no ifs and buts concerning his career in Aus.

Fell free to dismiss that if you wish, but it doesn't make sense to.

The fact of him saying he will come good and will be a good signing.....because og his career in Aus. You forgot the first part to meet your aguments needs.

If that was the case in the past Roberts, Fielden, Gleeson, Smith and Piggy will destroy SL on their own.

So the ability a player has shown during his career should not be considered when a club contemplates signing him?

Sorry, but that's a joke. You'd never sign anyone.

Whilst Riddell may not have hit the heights that some expected the plus side is that he is already better than Higham was.


When did Higham in his 3 years run 35 metres for a try for Wigan?
Riddells passing is infinitely better than Highams.Wigan are scoring more tries out wide now, is Riddells better distribution a factor? He is also conceding fewer penalties, which is another bonus.

You'll make his family members angry with facts like these RG