MattyB wrote:Don't think there has ever been another time when the town has been so divided.
This is one reason why the football will struggle to increase attendances. Only 21K against Liverpool the other night (with over 5,000 Liverpool fans)....tut tut.
Whelan is the cause behind it all. Without Whelan I wouldn't mind Latics, still wouldn't support them though.
I fully expect the divide to grow until it reaches boiling point.
Wigan/Leeds Andy wrote:Coverage has absolutely nothing to do with it. Our crowds went up by a load in about 10 years because we went from nothing to something, so have the Latics, yet for the insecure that's something to criticise them about.
I have evidence to back you up there, due to a recent University coursework piece.
I did a study on the JJB and found that although on average Latics had the higher growth in attendances since the JJB opened, Wigan RL still have the average higher attendances. Predictably Latics attendances grew in the 2006/07 season when they were promoted but instead of growing, they have declined. Whereas the Warriors attendances are steadily increasing.
I said it once and I'll say it again, when/if Whelan goes, the great divide between the town will reduce drastically and maybe then both teams attendances will steadily increase, which IMO can only be a good thing.
With regards to the shop at the stadium, as this is what the thread is about, I agree 100% that Latics should have a shop within the stadium and it is about time. But Wigan RL should also have a shop. There is absolutely no reason why the shop cannot be a dual purpose shop. Well, probably the only reason being that DW does not want anything to do with the rugby club. Does he not realise that the continous growing ill feeling will hurt Latics more than the rugby? People who would consider going to Latics games who are rugby fans may not go because of the way the Rugby club is being treated.
[quote="dontknowwhyibother"] What do I think to the RL people who continually downplay everything in RL, and influence the stupid sheep to think like them? I think they are one of the reasons that RL will always be a minor sport.[/quote]
Joined: Jan 31 2003 Posts: 1471 Location: the pheonix club........
for some strange reason i keep getting e-mails from latics and it says they are having a store in the ground with the support from the JJB sports company.. will it be put on hold when JJB folds?...cos sadly for the many employed there its looking that way. they have been given a 2 week breathing space on their loan by the bank.
also if JJb goes bankrupt will they change the name of the stadium.......the dave whelan stadium by any chance
Joined: Oct 10 2004 Posts: 6124 Location: Still at the Top
elliegg wrote:for some strange reason i keep getting e-mails from latics and it says they are having a store in the ground with the support from the JJB sports company.. will it be put on hold when JJB folds?...cos sadly for the many employed there its looking that way. they have been given a 2 week breathing space on their loan by the bank.
also if JJb goes bankrupt will they change the name of the stadium.......the dave whelan stadium by any chance
Can I have your crystal ball please?
23 - 20 - 4
Warrington led 16-2 in Saturday's Grand Final, but their joy was short-lived as Wigan roared back to win the Super League title and extend the Wire's 58-year wait to be champions
Wigan/Leeds Andy wrote:Coverage has absolutely nothing to do with it. Our crowds went up by a load in about 10 years because we went from nothing to something, so have the Latics, yet for the insecure that's something to criticise them about.
Great comments Andy,you seem to be one of the few on here with a reasonable view of events.
.
Didn't we have a Warriors Merchandise shop in the Town centre (in Marketgate) that lasted about 5 minutes ???
What's the point of ressurecting a failed idea ?.......As always I expect Whelan will be the obstacle, but a shared shop at the ground has to be the best way forward, as is the continued sharing of the ground itself. There is no other financial model that will ever make sense to BOTH clubs ....we have to get over this constant adolescent name calling and wittering on about relative sizes of crowds.
The long term benefit of both clubs, rests on a shared stadium , where a reasonable element of each club's support, feel happy to go and support the other side.....there are a few knocking about now but it needs to grow.
Although the continued presence of one man makes this highly unlikely in the short term.......and once again I'm not thinking of the Play off rearrangement , I happen to know (not suspect) DW was "put up against the wall" by the powers that be in the Prem League to guarantee that the football pitch wasn't compromised this year .....and whilst he's "Billy Big Time" round here ....He's strictly small fry amongst the big time gangsters and dictators that rule the roost in Football.........His despicable treatment of a former employee who is sadly no longer with us....that's the prime reason behind my distaste for the man, and as long as he's around the clubs and the supporters will not be able to move closer together.
Joined: Jan 31 2003 Posts: 1471 Location: the pheonix club........
orrell lad
i thought it was common knowledge that JJb is suffering finacial difficulties cos they lost loads of money in the icelandic banks crash.
also whelan has said in papers he is looking for a company who can pay him to have the stadium named after their company...a bit like shirt sponsorship.........i think lenegan should coff up the cash and we could call it the WIGAN RUGBY LEAGUE STADIUM......that would be nice
Joined: Sep 19 2003 Posts: 3525 Location: Manchester
MattyB wrote:IIRC At the first ever forum IL stated that when Wigan RL fans purchased tickets they had to make cheques payable to 'Wigan Football Club', this would be the first thing he was changing, which brought a huge cheer to the room.
If the above is the case then I'm seriously not impressed.
Come on Mr. Lenagan, please explain...!
Disappointing lack of historical knowledge there from IL.
"The Wigan Football Club" is THE HISTORIC NAME OF OUR CLUB. Just like Hull FC, Wigan FC was so called because the rugby club was founded at a time when "football" meant either rugby or association football and the first clubs to set up were rugby clubs. The association football clubs that came along later had to call themselves something else - eg. Hull City, Oldham Athletic Football Club, Rochdale Association Football Club - because the rugby football clubs got there first.
(I once had the misfortune of watching Rugby Lions (then in rah-rah's NL1) playing onion a few years ago, in the town whose school gave rugby its name. The sign above the clubhouse gives that club's official name - "The Rugby Football Club" - which is quite impressive, though of course they play the dull version of rugby.)
Anyway, back to the topic. I would rather gouge my own eyes out with a spoon than make a cheque out to Wigan AFC.
Badwanger wrote:IMO, Sculthorpe at his peak was better than Hanley was at his.
nickmanator wrote:billy boston in todays game might pinch a spot bringin the cone on and that bein kind
robbierotten wrote:Imo Sam Tomkins is a very poor mans Danny Brough he is just a average player getting bigged up by the idiots who comentate on sky.
Deano G wrote:Jonathan Davies, who is his equal in [Super League] today?
Users browsing this forum: jaws1, jonh and 241 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum