Post subject: Re: French, Ellis and Hill banned…
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2023 9:25 pm
MadDogg
Club Coach
Joined: Feb 21 2005 Posts: 9515 Location: Leeds
Trainman wrote:I fully expect the RFL will decide that none of them can use it for their bans as using the game would be against the spirit of the disciplinary process
Flashbacks to Wigan going against the 'spirit' of the salary cap in 2006...
Post subject: Re: French, Ellis and Hill banned…
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2023 12:02 am
Jukesays
Club Owner
Joined: Mar 30 2004 Posts: 7779 Location: Sorting my Erection out & Helping Conroy With his!
thesaint71 wrote:What game did Makinson do it in ? Don't remember LMS doing it again
This was sent to me earlier before the Bans were given
Law 15.1 Deliberate or reckless physical contact with a match official ( eg placing hand on arm to attract attention)
Last season McCarthy-Scarsbrook (August and September) and Makinson (September) were charged with this offence. LMS escaped a ban for the first offence and received one match for the second. Makinson was cautioned.
Fans Forum 28.08.08 Fan from Haydock
"I've got one word for you Mr Chairman - Penalty Count"
[quote="The Daddy"]I've got one word for you all......Steve Hanley[/quote]
Some Salford fan said to me and I quote "You are by far and away the most Handsome & Knowledgeable Rugby League Fan in England!"
I thanked him and went on my Merry way!
RIVERCAVE DWELLER OF THE YEAR 2015!
"The club used you last night and didn't tell the truth."
Post subject: Re: French, Ellis and Hill banned…
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2023 10:33 am
Zig
First Team Player
Joined: Jun 04 2022 Posts: 2248
Jukesays wrote:This was sent to me earlier before the Bans were given
Law 15.1 Deliberate or reckless physical contact with a match official ( eg placing hand on arm to attract attention)
Last season McCarthy-Scarsbrook (August and September) and Makinson (September) were charged with this offence. LMS escaped a ban for the first offence and received one match for the second. Makinson was cautioned.
Thank you Jukesays, that has saved me some work. All this about Wigan being treated leniently is a figment of some people’s imagination.
Post subject: Re: French, Ellis and Hill banned…
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2023 10:45 am
WWste
Club Captain
Joined: Aug 02 2019 Posts: 893
Zig wrote:Thank you Jukesays, that has saved me some work. All this about Wigan being treated leniently is a figment of some people’s imagination.
If we’re talking about leniency. Remember when Abdull got banned for 8 matches for a squirrel grip when Makinson got 5. Now I’m not sure how that could be ruled any different regardless to passed disciplinary actions
Post subject: Re: French, Ellis and Hill banned…
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2023 11:09 am
NickyKiss
International Board Member
Joined: Nov 08 2004 Posts: 29773 Location: WIGAN
Rogues Gallery wrote:By whom?
He's noted elsewhere that his info was incorrect Rogues.
The whole situation is simply bringing out a lot of peoples hatred to all things Wigan. Reading about various social media platforms and forums, the common line is that Wigan are wrong for 'using a loophole' but these same people haven't mentioned this in the past, when other clubs have benefitted from it. People are also going on about Wigan finding a loophole as though they've filled in some sort of application form or sent an email to the top brass stating they should serve the bans in the reserves. The only way Wigan couldn't benefit from it is if they said themselves 'no, we don't agree with them using it in the reserves and will stand them down from the semi final' and as everyone knows, Wigan and every other club on the planet would not do that. It's the journo's like John Davidson that jump all over it and fail to mention this isn't a new thing or a Wigan thing that annoy me the most.
Post subject: Re: French, Ellis and Hill banned…
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2023 11:38 am
WWste
Club Captain
Joined: Aug 02 2019 Posts: 893
NickyKiss wrote:He's noted elsewhere that his info was incorrect Rogues.
The whole situation is simply bringing out a lot of peoples hatred to all things Wigan. Reading about various social media platforms and forums, the common line is that Wigan are wrong for 'using a loophole' but these same people haven't mentioned this in the past, when other clubs have benefitted from it. People are also going on about Wigan finding a loophole as though they've filled in some sort of application form or sent an email to the top brass stating they should serve the bans in the reserves. The only way Wigan couldn't benefit from it is if they said themselves 'no, we don't agree with them using it in the reserves and will stand them down from the semi final' and as everyone knows, Wigan and every other club on the planet would not do that. It's the journo's like John Davidson that jump all over it and fail to mention this isn't a new thing or a Wigan thing that annoy me the most.
Think League Express have now put a article out about how many times SL clubs have used it
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Saddened!, Wolves17 and 239 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
