post wrote:He has often played second row for St George and Parramatta, why not prop?
I know he has and I agree When I heard he could play prop it brought a smile to my face Just dont know where it leaves us hooker wise. Cant see Riddell playing 30mins hooker then prop
RICHARDS IS SUPERMAN!!!!
Wire_91 wrote:its your first final in about 8 years and now you ravin and rantin about it F**k off, and ill be going old trafford tomoz cheering on the saints and ill be writing on this forum givin you loads of shi* when your drying you eyes and the wire fan will be here handing out the tissues in the thousands, thats if you do take that many fans cause now it looks like its your fans who have jumped on the band wagon now your in a final, this time last year there was only 1000 people in the jjb and now its fillin up cause youve won the league hahaha proper true supporters you are
Joined: Sep 06 2002 Posts: 851 Location: Checking on my deferred payments
Whatever the side, imo we cant play Bailey and Hansen in the same side - they are just too alike.
When the two are on the pitch together you may as well forget about the ball getting out to the centre because neither look to pass, or have the ability to pass the ball.
My side :-
Phelps
Roberts
Goulding
Gleeson
Ainscough
Tomkins
Lu Lu
Prescott
McClorum
Coley
O Loughlin
Hock
Tomkins
Noble said, in his video on the Warriors web site, that Paat may be ok for Monday. So he can't be too seriously injured. In any case I thought Phelps had a good game and arguably better on attack that Paat.
nohalfbacks wrote:Noble said, in his video on the Warriors web site, that Paat may be ok for Monday. So he can't be too seriously injured. In any case I thought Phelps had a good game and arguably better on attack that Paat.
But we miss Pat's goalkicking when he's not playing.
Don't let your love turn to hate Now we've got to keep the faith
nohalfbacks wrote:Noble said, in his video on the Warriors web site, that Paat may be ok for Monday. So he can't be too seriously injured. In any case I thought Phelps had a good game and arguably better on attack that Paat.
Saw that.
If he's fit i'd be tempted to switch Phelps to 6 with Sam Tomkins taking McIlorums place on the bench.
Joined: May 12 2007 Posts: 1568 Location: eating pies wearing cherry and white
NickyKiss wrote:I think we have to try and keep Phelps in around the middle of the pitch if at all possible.
His best game by far for us(although still a few big errors) so i'd be loathed to move him.
interesting line up but gleeson is a centre. i know he can play stand off but we have been crying out for a class centre for years who can distribute to his winger. would be a waste imo to puthim to stand off when we have sam. would much rather perservere with sam/tommy then move a strike Centre to the middle of the park and leave our wingers starved of possesion like recent years
NickyKiss wrote:I think we have to try and keep Phelps in around the middle of the pitch if at all possible.
His best game by far for us(although still a few big errors) so i'd be loathed to move him.
yeah youve got a point with phelps' defencive frailties at centre. perhaps just swap him and gleese around then at centre and S/o. Would like to see tommy do a full game at hooker tho....and gleeson in the s/o position at some point....actually think they are both players natural positions and often where they have had their best games.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
When I heard he could play prop it brought a smile to my face 
Just dont know where it leaves us hooker wise. Cant see Riddell playing 30mins hooker then prop 
