Richards
Pryce - Bailey - Carmont - Ainscough
Tomkins - Leuluai
Tomkins - O'Loughlin - Hansen
Fielden - McIlorum - Palaea'sasina

Riddell
Prescott
O'Carroll
Hock

Pryce in for Roberts, Prescott in for Coley/O'Carroll. Otherwise same as last week.

Got told today Smith will certainly not play, naming him the 19 makes it appear a selection issue though rather than a discliplinary issue.

Care to elaborate on his discipliary issues AJ?

Surprised to see Roberts left out, maybe he has an injury?

I'd go with:

Richards
Pryce
Bailey
Carmont
Ainscough
Smith
Leuluai
Fielden
Riddell
O'Carroll
Hansen
J.Tomkins
O'Loughlin

Palea'aesina
Hock
S.Tomkins/McIlorum - If S.Tomkins, bring Riddell off, Tommy at hooker, Smith at SH and S.Tomkins at SO and vice-versa when Riddell comes back.
Prescott

I thought that but the site doesn't mention this when it usually does for other players. It just says:

I think he has been dropped. He was poor against Leeds in terms of his positioning and failing to deal with the high kick but I think it would be a bit harsh to drop someone still trying to settle into the squad.

It payed dividends when we showed patience with Mark Riddell. I was hoping the same could happen to Roberts.

Gives Karl Pryce a chance though which is good.

Yes it is. I would have liked to have seen him given a shot at centre. He has said to Brian Noble that this is where he would like to be played.

But still I'm happy to see him in the side and fully fit.

Well, as long as Sam and Ainscough are still in there, Noble cant of gone much wrong.

Me too, the fact that he's playing is a bonus and in the pre-season matches his defence didn't seem to be up to SL level so it's perhaps better that he's on the wing.

I only saw one pre-season match and that was against Warrington and he only made one defensive error in that game and that was from a high kick playing on the wing.

Didn't go to the others so if he made any defensive errors that doesn't relate to the wing position then fair enough.