Mark_P1973 wrote:i get what you are saying about production line. i think we've had a similar spell post Tomkins, Charnley, Burgess, etc where we've produced far more forwards (mainly back row too) than quality backs.
my mate who i was chatting to yesterday was unsure re academy too. He lost interest a few years back due to something that happened at Saints, but still keeps an interest in 1st team
He also commented re Blake, saying that whilst not top drawer, should be an astute signing for this year, and perhaps an extension thereafter
He rated Ritson more highly than i did, but that often comes from not seeing a player week in week out and forming an opinion in that way, but i do agree he's in a top setup to get the best out of a player if they are going to make it, and i dont think he'll be costing you a fortune on the cap either
Our record in bringing through top quality backs in the last few years isn’t the best. The club is getting the rewards if being patient with Harry Smith but there hasn’t been much else. Hopefully Eckersley, Douglas and Farrimond can be the ones that turn that tide.
On the flip side we’ve had forwards coming out of our ears. I remember going to one of the last London Skolar pre season games and the young Wigan pack was stacked, with guys like Byrne, Havard, Shorrocks, Smithies, McDonnell, Rushton, Partington etc turning out.
NickyKiss wrote:Our record in bringing through top quality backs in the last few years isn’t the best. The club is getting the rewards if being patient with Harry Smith but there hasn’t been much else. Hopefully Eckersley, Douglas and Farrimond can be the ones that turn that tide.
On the flip side we’ve had forwards coming out of our ears. I remember going to one of the last London Skolar pre season games and the young Wigan pack was stacked, with guys like Byrne, Havard, Shorrocks, Smithies, McDonnell, Rushton, Partington etc turning out.
I think it’s indicative of the British game in general. We’ve always had quality forwards but lack real quality backs at times particularly centres.
We’ve matched Australia in the pack numerous times but it’s the backs where they’ve had the upper hand on us.
Stu M wrote:I think it’s indicative of the British game in general. We’ve always had quality forwards but lack real quality backs at times particularly centres.
We’ve matched Australia in the pack numerous times but it’s the backs where they’ve had the upper hand on us.
True enough. I suppose when you look at our very best backs over the last couple of decades, they’d still fall short of guys like Inglis, Slater, Mitchell, Tedesco etc. If you’re a freakish athlete in this country you’re likely to follow they money and look toward football or other sports and that limits the amount of top quality backs we bring through. In fairness I do think we’re looking as strong as we’ve done in a long while in the outside backs. Guys like Farnworth and Dom Young are those sort of big, quick, powerful athletes we don’t produce very often (with the NRL obviously helping to round them off).
NickyKiss wrote:True enough. I suppose when you look at our very best backs over the last couple of decades, they’d still fall short of guys like Inglis, Slater, Mitchell, Tedesco etc. If you’re a freakish athlete in this country you’re likely to follow they money and look toward football or other sports and that limits the amount of top quality backs we bring through. In fairness I do think we’re looking as strong as we’ve done in a long while in the outside backs. Guys like Farnworth and Dom Young are those sort of big, quick, powerful athletes we don’t produce very often (with the NRL obviously helping to round them off).
Agreed. Farnworth and Young are bucking the trend.
Joined: May 27 2003 Posts: 20417 Location: educating League Freak on all things rugby league
ralvag wrote:He's certainly in the conversation where wingers are concerned.
It comes down to how highly you value wingers.
I think not too long ago they were regarded as simply finishers.
They obviously brought something to the table but there influence was generally at the attacking end of the spectrum.
I think Jerry, Hall and TM probably lead the way in changing that in SL along with their coaches which has seen them being crucial to exit sets but also being expected to do the finishing too.
I think wingers stock has risen significantly in regards their role in the team in the last decade, and rightly so.
Unofficially the most boring poster on Cherry and White.
jonh wrote:It comes down to how highly you value wingers.
I think not too long ago they were regarded as simply finishers.
They obviously brought something to the table but there influence was generally at the attacking end of the spectrum.
I think Jerry, Hall and TM probably lead the way in changing that in SL along with their coaches which has seen them being crucial to exit sets but also being expected to do the finishing too.
I think wingers stock has risen significantly in regards their role in the team in the last decade, and rightly so.
i'd go back to Charnley and Richards at Wigan when MM 1st came. Very rarely did Sam run the ball in but offload to one of the wingers, who took in 1st and then 2nd balls, with George Carmont / Martin Gleeson also taking in early drives (add in Gelling too). We've used our backs for a long time for exit sets, its just we were very effective last year compared to recent seasons
In terms of a try’s per game ratio, guys like Makinson and Hall trail well behind a guy like Charnley but both are far better all round players IMO (or they were in Halls case) and for the reasons pointed out above. In terms of all time Superleague wingers, I’d probably have Makinson towards the lower end of a top 10 but he’d definitely be in that conversation. Makinson and Hall are two guys who reserved their best for England as well, so that helps their reputations.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
