I think the only reason we can want to move him on is because we must have someone who the coaches feel is an improvement to come in.

Do we know if its a permanent move or a loan?

Personally, I think that's the right approach. If he's better than what you have at the time then play him. If you can then move him on for someone better, then it's all good for the club.

Compare that to Lam's time and it was criminal how he didn't recall Hankinson, or use Mitch Clarke more. Now neither had a future at the club, but I'd have rather have seen Hank at centre and Faz in the pack. Likewise a choice of Clarke or Clubb should have been a no-brainer. It was even more criminal, when you factor in he flogged a load of kids instead.

Just seen Matt Shaw saying neither going to Fev, Gledhill wrong again.

Luke Thompson and Frizell in for Mago and Bateman

I just listened to Gledhills podcast..hells teeth my ears nearly got burnt with all the hot air going on the guests

Wishful thinking or rumour

Do tell NSW

Be stuff of our wildest dreams would Thompson and Frizell. Imagine that side on paper with those two. One of the best in many a year. Sadly I think it’ll remain in our dreams.

Dreaming pal