Joined: May 27 2003 Posts: 20508 Location: educating League Freak on all things rugby league
Marsdengiant wrote:
Jukesays wrote: And do you have a view on naming young players and 'rubbishing' them when they have not featured in the thread?
The poster who claims Hudds are better than Wigan re development is clearly wrong. The poster who claims homegrown rules were created to deal with quota issues is clearly wrong. The poster who names 'kids' and runs them down to make a cheap point is contemptible.
Kids! Get a grip they are pro sportsmen just like other players there age. Many young Wigan players are run down by opposition and even our own fans, why are other clubs players exempt for expressing an opinion on.
A few clubs have done it who have had poor records at producing young players Hudds are not alone in this, the rules that were brought in forced some clubs to promote lads who were not ready to full time contracts simply because they came through the ranks of there respective clubs.
Unofficially the most boring poster on Cherry and White.
Marsdengiant wrote: Raleigh was in your Academy for a year, he left went to uni, Ralleigh earned his stripes at Sheffield and Hull KR, claiming Ralleigh as a product of the Giants is like Saints claiming Wilkin and Gardener are products of there system........and i feel no shame.
I have put my hand up and confirmed i was wrong about Hudson even though he is a Cas player and does not count towards Hudds home grown players, why you seem hung up on this issue even though i have put my hand up rather than addressing any other points raised makes me think you are struggling to respond
As for the homegrown rules being created to deal with quota issues ie the number of foreign players in our game which is a pretty big issue if not the biggest, see below, it is exaclty the reason it was introduced.
You are basing your understanding on that article. You must be kidding. Even the journalist resorts to vague phrases to cover his lack of understanding.
Fed trained deals with quota. Only an imbecile would think that a 'homegrown catagory' can address such issues
jonh wrote:
Marsdengiant wrote: Raleigh was in your Academy for a year, he left went to uni, Ralleigh earned his stripes at Sheffield and Hull KR, claiming Ralleigh as a product of the Giants is like Saints claiming Wilkin and Gardener are products of there system........and i feel no shame.
I have put my hand up and confirmed i was wrong about Hudson even though he is a Cas player and does not count towards Hudds home grown players, why you seem hung up on this issue even though i have put my hand up rather than addressing any other points raised makes me think you are struggling to respond
As for the homegrown rules being created to deal with quota issues ie the number of foreign players in our game which is a pretty big issue if not the biggest, see below, it is exaclty the reason it was introduced.
You are basing your understanding on that article. You must be kidding. Even the journalist resorts to vague phrases to cover his lack of understanding.
Fed trained deals with quota. Only an imbecile would think that a 'homegrown catagory' can address such issues
Kids! Get a grip they are pro sportsmen just like other players there age. Many young Wigan players are run down by opposition and even our own fans, why are other clubs players exempt for expressing an opinion on.
A few clubs have done it who have had poor records at producing young players Hudds are not alone in this, the rules that were brought in forced some clubs to promote lads who were not ready to full time contracts simply because they came through the ranks of there respective clubs.
Just because they are young sportsmen does not mean you have to be cheap and squalid. That has been your choice. Just because other people make cheap and infantile comments about Wigan players does not mean you have to do likewise. A mature person would understand that it is not necessary.
You could make points without cheap references to players. You either lack the intelligence or integrity to do so. Trying to defend a cheap shot does you no credit.
Joined: May 27 2003 Posts: 20508 Location: educating League Freak on all things rugby league
Marsdengiant wrote:
jonh wrote: You are basing your understanding on that article. You must be kidding. Even the journalist resorts to vague phrases to cover his lack of understanding.
Fed trained deals with quota. Only an imbecile would think that a 'homegrown catagory' can address such issues
Mate the 2 go hand in hand, increasing the home grown talent ensures that clubs should not have to rely on non federation trained players, the 2 exist together and have everything to do with reducing the number of overseas players in our game.
In the face of the evidence only an imbecile would claim that the home grown rule has nothing to do with ending our reliance on overseas players, when the entire point of it is to promote young players and invest in them which some clubs including Huddersfield have not done up untill the rules have made it so.
Is it any suprise that several new positons were created at Huddersfield with the conception of this rule, or is it just a coincidence?
edit: on the plus side you have just promoted Adam Walker a lad who will bring something to the table which will see one of the players i mentioned earlier leave the club in the not too distant future they certainly will not be there in 2010, pretty much proving the point.
Unofficially the most boring poster on Cherry and White.
Mate the 2 go hand in hand, increasing the home grown talent ensures that clubs should not have to rely on non federation trained players, the 2 exist together and have everything to do with reducing the number of overseas players in our game.
In the face of the evidence only an imbecile would claim that the home grown rule has nothing to do with ending our reliance on overseas players, when the entire point of it is to promote young players and invest in them which some clubs including Huddersfield have not done up untill the rules have made it so.
Is it any suprise that several new positons were created at Huddersfield with the conception of this rule, or is it just a coincidence?
You really must stop relying on dubious articles for your information. Otherwise you will keep getting it wrong and kidding yourself that you 'are in the know' Your confusion of 'reliance on overseas players' with quota and presumably european employment law is par for the course.
As I said, and you slowly grasp, the homegrown rule is about encouraging clubs to develop more players (not a quota issue).
Your final point once again declares your ignorance re the Giants and RFL sky funding. No surprise there. All SL clubs must have certain appointments/ roles fulfilled to get all their sky money. With a new head of YD you also expect some changes in personnel. So its not a coincidence. Just not down to the fictions you create.
Joined: May 27 2003 Posts: 20508 Location: educating League Freak on all things rugby league
Marsdengiant wrote:
jonh wrote: You really must stop relying on dubious articles for your information. Otherwise you will keep getting it wrong and kidding yourself that you 'are in the know' Your confusion of 'reliance on overseas players' with quota and presumably european employment law is par for the course.
As I said, and you slowly grasp, the homegrown rule is about encouraging clubs to develop more players (not a quota issue).
Your final point once again declares your ignorance re the Giants and RFL sky funding. No surprise there. All SL clubs must have certain appointments/ roles fulfilled to get all their sky money. With a new head of YD you also expect some changes in personnel. So its not a coincidence. Just not down to the fictions you create.
So what was Pete Riding brought to the club for, and then Damien McGragh, and then Karl Harrison? These people were brought to the club as the Giants realised they has to stop rellying on other clubs and had to get to work on developing there own players for a change.
Lets continue this via pm as it has nothing to do with the Wigan thread, but i can assure you i am far from ignorant of Huddersfield Giants.
Unofficially the most boring poster on Cherry and White.
Marsdengiant wrote: So what was Pete Riding brought to the club for, and then Damien McGragh, and then Karl Harrison? These people were brought to the club as the Giants realised they has to stop rellying on other clubs and had to get to work on developing there own players for a change.
Lets continue this via pm as it has nothing to do with the Wigan thread, but i can assure you i am far from ignorant of Huddersfield Giants.
Your assurances count for nothing given the ill informed statements.
Riding was appointed as PPM when Cooper became ft conditioner. The RFL insist that all clubs have a PPM - so that would explain that appointmet
RFL insist that all SL clubs have a head of Youth Development. Take a look around and see them getting appointed So the Giants have got one - a very good one. These YD guys wil make changes in personnel. If they have good contacts they will bring in good people like KH.
No this need not be a giants thing. Your knowledge is limited on that subject. Stick to Wigan and wakey.
I pointed out that homegrown definitions are nothing to do with quota and then said I found your need to name a slag off players was cheap. Exchanging pms with you would bore me.
Joined: May 27 2003 Posts: 20508 Location: educating League Freak on all things rugby league
Marsdengiant wrote:
jonh wrote: Your assurances count for nothing given the ill informed statements.
Riding was appointed as PPM when Cooper became ft conditioner. The RFL insist that all clubs have a PPM - so that would explain that appointmet
RFL insist that all SL clubs have a head of Youth Development. Take a look around and see them getting appointed So the Giants have got one - a very good one. These YD guys wil make changes in personnel. If they have good contacts they will bring in good people like KH.
No this need not be a giants thing. Your knowledge is limited on that subject. Stick to Wigan and wakey.
I pointed out that homegrown definitions are nothing to do with quota and then said I found your need to name a slag off players was cheap. Exchanging pms with you would bore me.
The appointment af all these people that I named coincided with the change in the rules as i said it was born out of necesity and shows that the Giants were not concerned or interested in investing significantly in youth prior to the rules forcing them to do so, so thanks for highlighting that.
Il end on this one then, if there is no link between the federation trained rule and the overseas players influence on the game, regardless of what Richard Lewis has stated in the article which you simply dismiss, why is there a direct correlation between rules implimenting a reduction in the overseas players and increasing the home grown players, another coincidence.
Unofficially the most boring poster on Cherry and White.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum