You can use stats to prove anything 85% of people know this, however i think this is one you cannot argue with.



I dont understand the argument of its not nobbys team (for the first two years)



Nathan Brown doesnt seem to find it too hard, and time will tell if Mick Potter takes stains downwards.



I do think a lot of problems where created under the previous regime, but the glaring mistakes made in recruitment, can only be laid at Nobles and IL's door.



And to say we are lost because we dont have Trent is also a cop out. When Cats lost Stacey Jones, other players STOOD UP and they had their best season!

And this, to me, is the inherent rot to which I referred in my post above. I know the club's hired more staff of late but the concern I have is that they'll be Noble's appointments or appointments made with Noble's blessing. IF Noble's given the Big E at some stage soon then will Wigan be replacing these coaches shortly?

What errors are these that you keep going on about? The responsibility the fans have is to not throw the baby out with the bath water before the job is completed (team rebuilding). I would say the biggest mistake made by the club was to allow Trent Barrett to leave a year early as they should of seen the huge hole it would leave behind. Its ok saying why didnt we bring in a replacement but maybe there just wasnt one along with any props that would improve us.

Give over. They have had more than enough time.



The entire recruitment looks haphazard. We have signed Phelps, Pryce, Roberts and Gleeson when we needed a prop. It is not as if Gleeson was the only back we signed when we needed a prop. There was obviously enough cash around to sign one given we signed the first three never mind Gleeson.



It is a mistake (to put it mildly) to have gone down this route and I do not accept it is all IL's doing. Noble must carry the can and therefore the fact we are light in the front row but try and play as if we are not is down to him.



But recruitment aside Noble needs to go because he has been exposed as a poor coach.



Dave

It is not a cop out at all. You cannot lose a Trent Barrett or any other world class player and expect to improve without replacing him. Barrett simply papered over the cracks in the Wigan team and won us games we should of lost. Catalans have a huge pack (we dont) and had a decent replacement for Jones in whatever his name is who plays 7 now.

our problem is we set our teams standards too high. From what i can see, our team is just NOT good enough

I mean, we are leagues behind leeds and Saints in both perfomance on the pitch and our consistency over the season. Its all well and good pulling off a magical victory at Leeds, but following it on with a dodgey home win to a "lesser side" is not championship winning-material. At the end of the day we sign average and exspensive players, who generally under-perform and fail to meet expectations, never mind exceed them, with the odd exception eg) barrett. Players such as Mathers, pryce, roberts, smith, fielden, riddell are all fine examples of players who have done nothing but waste vital space in our salary cap and destory the hopes of many talented young budding super league stars in our academy. At the moment we are putting too much pressure on the shoulders of tomkins and ainscough. Ok they have amazing potential; but to expect them to lead the team to grand final glory is simply ridiculous and further highlights the lack of effort our more experienced players (eg Riddell) are putting into playing and leading the team.

I like how you got a Noble-ism in. There was no stand offs or props available that would be better than what we have? I dont believe that for 1 second. We knew Trent was going for a while before the end of last season so they had plenty time to put the feelers out and weve needed another prop for 18 months now. How long do they want?

Tell me which halfback we should of signed then Dave to replace Barrett. While your at it which props to strengthen the front row. The truth is we missed out on Todd Carney and Greg Bird but it didnt matter anyway as we couldnt of signed them in the long run. The players that have been signed are fine if you look at the bigger picture of building the team/squad.



Your opinion of Noble being a poor coach is just that-your opinion.

We could not sign one though we tried in Bird. We could not sign him because we had used the quota up on Phelps and Roberts. The rebuilding you keep banging on about is a shambolic effort.



In any case the current results are down to the current team under performing. While we all recognise we need a prop it won't make that much of a difference if we continue to see things like one man RL, seemingly unfit players (Riddell is a joke) and a defence that caves in far too easily.



The team is playing very poorly and your idea that this will all be solved by recruitment for next year is too simplistic. Recruit who you like but unless the team they join bucks up and is better coached we will be writing the same thing next year.



Dave

It is one I can back up with evidence. You on the other hand cannot back up your opinion he is a Wigan good coach with any evidence at all.



Dave

The fact is there wasnt any other than Greg Bird and Todd carney which we tried to sign and failed for whatever reason and even had we got them they wouldnt of been able to play for us. We have to be prepared to crack a few eggs to make an omlette

As this now seems to be going down the Noble route again. I'm been having a think of who has been signed that it could be claimed Noble was part of the decision to make the signing. Off the top of my head I can think of:



Fielden

Dobson

McAvoy

Mathers

Carmont

Pryce

Roberts

Coley

Riddell

Bailey

Gleeson

Smith

Phelps

Withers



That's 14 players - have I missed any? Haven't included Barrett and Lulu because they were both recruited prior to Noble joining us. Obviously some were very short term for 2006 and others have been and gone, but that's a lot of players we've changed over three seasons.