Dom brambani disagreed with the TJ view on a call, and told him so, something to do with copulating and female anatomy, hence the red card.
No arguement, from anyone on the red
Jarrod was HIA which he failed hence why he did not come back on, and no he could not have come back on.
Jossy, I think most folk think the same as me re the performance

Odd that Jarrod should have gone back to the bench after the HIA if he had failed.

Nothing says they can’t go back to the bench, they don’t have to stay in the dressing room

In fact you will usually see em do that

Does Jarrod have to miss a game for failing HIA or is that concussion in general

Depends on the level of concussion on the recovery protocol and how he reacts to further testing this week. He will have been assessed by the doc on mon and today, depends on that on if he will be able to play next week.
Unless it was a bad one, or he was unconscious it’s likely he will be ok.
He looked ok back on the bench on Sunday so suspect it was minor knock, although secondary onset can be interesting

I would not be playing Jarrod anyway. Give him the weekend off.

I think that would be the sensible option, given he is key to our top 4 aspirations!

I remember that game, I left well before the end, I thought if the players can't be ar5ed ( and they clearly couldn't!) why should I?

As you say scroll forward 3 seasons and we can criticise a performance where we win by 50 points , scoring nearly 70!