WWW.RLFANS.COM https://rlfans.com/forums/ |
|
to clarify a point https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=431903 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Crackerjack [ Sun Sep 27, 2009 12:00 am ] |
Post subject: | to clarify a point |
No trouble causing -just to straighten things up as it would seem a lot of this "locking" is down to people perceiving what they think they read - rather than wot is wrote! ..........and the mud is slung I think if you proof read my posts you will nowhere find that I say Robinson is a top flight scrum half If you can I apologise In the hope that this constant bickering comes to an end --and I am being perfectly serious -- I will state my position My opinions are (sadly) purely based on watching the giants/fartown for 62 years The game has changed in many ways and the venue simultaneously I have seen many coaches and many players and differing styles of play that cannot really be compared as there is no "like for like" situation Rules have also changed and tactics Supposedly , bottom line- the game fundamentally remains the same --though I would similarly dispute that theory But it is --despite the tampering of our wonderful reffing system and standards a major part of my interests/ hobbies So my thoughts on todays game - may, I admit - be slightly distorted and biased by what I have watched over all these seasons and other "younger" posters/fans may not be swayed by such comparisons Similarly though -- I strongly feel that they cannot / should not make assumptions /opinions on something they have not witnessed on a regular basis "first hand" This would even apply to Tony Smith and Nathan Brown I am not seeking to brag - but it is fact Similarly -- I am not a coach -- have no qualifications - nor have I played professionally So -- at the risk of repeating myself --the above experience is what formulates my opinions and responses If someone has a different opinion - I will listen and consider the arguments . I will not necessarily be in agreement I would listen intently to Smith/ Brown / Kear / Sharpe etc and accept that they are more vastly more suitably qualified -- but it would not mean that I would agree There are posters on here that similarly have strong viewpoints - and I will read and consider -- but the same applies They also may be qualified / have played the game/ and by their background/ contacts have a greater knowledge of the tactics and players qualities in relation to the modern/ present game I am honest enough to admit that However - whether we chose to agree or disagree - I will accept their point of view - and I expect them to return the compliment I stress that no amount of sarcasm/ innuendo / table banging /repetition or p----s taking will cause me to change my mind if I think otherwise and that is why I and they sometimes get a "little steamed up" over topics Mr Mod I hope that clarifies my side of the "discussion" and means you can put the set of keys back in the desk drawer !! Now -- to return to Luke -- check if you like --(and this is not, Codey ) an attempt to star the merry-go-round again The point I was making was this The "topic" raised its head when we were still "in with a shout" of reaching Old Trafford I know full well that the Carney episode left us wanting and meant that "something" had to be sorted What got sorted was that Luke "got the job" - whether or not Nathan secretly would have preferred otherwise It also scripted that KBrown - previously a centre " by trade (only joking MG ) became the SO Again ( and I believe Mg might have more info on this than me) it may not have been Nathan Browns first preference -and I am fully aware that many fans felt a little dubious about the "arrangement" Nevertheless - despite the introduction of Fulton as back-up, that is generally how it stayed and despite Lukes perceived "hindrance" by some culminated in a 3rd position and a cup final appearance With Fridays Catalan match imminent - the point I made/was making was that to single him out as the problem/weak link was completely wrong in my eyes and totally destructive To criticise any player ( and to be honest that could have included Moore and Mason especially when an Old Trafford final beckoned was the wrong thing for OUR supporters to do "in my opinion" I was not (intentionally) bulling him up or otherwise pulling him down I saw first hand what effect "criticism and barracking" had on Thorman - hence the parallel comparisons I made In my mind there are 17 players who make up the squad every week and I`m pretty sure he has been an ever present or pretty near I am not saying, nor did I infer, he is in Brett Hodgsons class either ( I stand to be corrected ) I purely said that in a democratic poll by a group of keen fans , he was voted "man of the match" and close on a considerable number of games which meant that prior to Fridays match --he was in the lead We get back to the fact that there are others who would not have voted for him as such That is not something I will take points from --they are entitled to that opinion But the others did--and that, too, is "THEIR" opinion- and a considerable number voted on a democratic basis So to blame one player (" had Brough, Burrows etc been playing we would have been in the semi") is I would argue extremely harsh and the timing similarly debatable Deacon, Burrows amd Brough have a stonger kicking game - but the first two have an inherent problem with forward passes (though not always given) ........and yes I do agree that the original plan to recruit a halfback of Carneys quality was probably the preferred option The topic then drifted onto " a pair of halfbacks" This brings into question Browns perceived role when he returns from injury as he has just been given quite a lengthy contract So I presume the same posters arent happy with his game in his recent position either Again -- I think weve missed the lad - he has improved by leaps and bounds over the season - so what now Do they see him reverting to a utility role?? I am not party to behind the scenes talk or I may have different opinions MG and others may well have --in which case they speak from a position of strength I do not possess However I do acknowledge that Nathan Brown has improved quite a number of players beyond recognition and the team considerably I will therfore renew my membership and season ticket as I have done for 61 seasons - let him do the job and recruit as he feels fit , and give him, the Giants , and Luke (in whatever role he is chosen) my full support next season Hope that makes a peace treaty possible mods ! |
Author: | Giantscorpio [ Sun Sep 27, 2009 12:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
When is the next book due out. ?? |
Author: | Crackerjack [ Sun Sep 27, 2009 12:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
..............youre asking for it an`half!................... |
Author: | Marsdengiant [ Sun Sep 27, 2009 2:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: to clarify a point |
Crackerjack wrote: snip
The post does not clarify but it does illustrate they way you like to comment. There are several references to another poster (me) and needless assumptions about what I know / do not know. There are assumptions and speculations about what other posters know or feel. All this is unnecessary. Several posters do not rate LR as a top level SH. They have given reasons why. When you respond with references to knive shops / builders /'Topics' and accuse people of having personal vendettas you should not be surprised that posters find it difficult to understand what you are on about. Your writing style can be rambling and disjointed. If you do not want to be misunderstood aim for a more coherent writing structure. If you do not want to be 'mis perceived' aim to write clearly and on subject. |
Author: | Crackerjack [ Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: to clarify a point |
[quote="Crackerjack"]No trouble causing -just to straighten things up as it would seem a lot of this "locking" is down to people perceiving what they think they read - rather than wot is wrote! ..........and the mud is slung In the hope that this constant bickering comes to an end --and I am being perfectly serious -- I will state my position .....................again! |
Author: | Crackerjack [ Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: to clarify a point |
Crackerjack wrote:No trouble causing -just to straighten things up as it would seem a lot of this "locking" is down to people perceiving what they think they read - rather than wot is wrote! ..........and the mud is slung
In the hope that this constant bickering comes to an end --and I am being perfectly serious -- I will state my position ..................... Similarly -- I am not a coach -- have no qualifications - nor have I played professionally If someone has a different opinion - I will listen and consider the arguments . I will not necessarily be in agreement There are posters on here that similarly have strong viewpoints - and I will read and consider -- but the same applies They also MAY be qualified / have played the game/ and by their background/ contacts have a greater knowledge of the tactics and players qualities in relation to the modern/ present game I am honest enough to admit that However - whether we chose to agree or disagree - I will accept their point of view - and I expect them to return the compliment I stress that no amount of sarcasm/ innuendo / table banging /repetition or p----s taking will cause me to change my mind if I think otherwise and that is why I and they sometimes get a "little steamed up" over topics Mr Mod I hope that clarifies my side of the "discussion" and means you can put the set of keys back in the desk drawer !! Now -- to return to Luke -- check if you like --(and this is not, Codey ) an attempt to star the merry-go-round again The point I was making was this Again ( and I believe Mg MIGHT have more info on this than me) it MAY not have been Nathan Browns first preference -and I am fully aware that many fans felt a little dubious about the "arrangement" In my mind there are 17 players who make up the squad every week and I`m pretty sure he has been an ever present or pretty near I am not saying, nor did I infer, he is in Brett Hodgsons class either ( I stand to be corrected ) I purely said that in a democratic poll by a group of keen fans , he was voted "man of the match" and close on a considerable number of games which meant that prior to Fridays match --he was in the lead We get back to the fact that there are others who would not have voted for him as such That is not something I will take points from --they are entitled to that opinion But the others did--and that, too, is "THEIR" opinion- and a considerable number voted on a democratic basis So to blame one player (" had Brough, Burrows etc been playing we would have been in the semi") is I would argue extremely harsh and the timing similarly debatable (I have not put words into your mouth - that is what you said --and whilst purely supposition is your opinion -no prob with that) I am not party to behind the scenes talk or I MAY have different opinions MG and others MAY well have --in which case they speak from a position of strength I do not possess However I do acknowledge that Nathan Brown has improved quite a number of players beyond recognition and the team considerably I will therfore renew my membership and season ticket as I have done for 61 seasons - let him do the job and recruit as he feels fit , and give him, the Giants , and Luke (in whatever role he is chosen) my full support next season Hope that makes a peace treaty possible mods ! Just edited it to clarify I was not making the assumptions you are claiming -- Please try reading what I actually wrote again Thanks |
Author: | goodie [ Sun Sep 27, 2009 8:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
most importantly does nathan brown think he is a top super league scrum half, if the suggestions that robbo will be hooker next year then possibly not, personally think robbo has been good most of the season, but his lack of a good kicking game does hold him back and could be the reason we have resigned drew, for me we need at least 2 new half backs next season along with brown and drew, we have struggled for creativity since brown got hurt due to lack of a decent replacement and robbo cant do it all on his own.I said it last year for me luke plays like a hooker and probably will be one soon hopefully as good as lowes was after he switched from half back. |
Author: | Code13 [ Sun Sep 27, 2009 8:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Is that the sound of a thread being locked? |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |