For me giants don't need Moore next season.
Lunt is
1 Faster
2 More skilful
3 More versatile
4 On a contract.
Lunt just gets better and better. What a prospect.
| WWW.RLFANS.COM https://rlfans.com/forums/ |
|
| Lunt V Moore https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=429970 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | wigsey [ Sun Sep 13, 2009 5:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Lunt V Moore |
For me giants don't need Moore next season. Lunt is 1 Faster 2 More skilful 3 More versatile 4 On a contract. Lunt just gets better and better. What a prospect.
|
|
| Author: | newgiant [ Sun Sep 13, 2009 5:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
bye bye Scott you arent needed anymore...... silly silly boy 
|
|
| Author: | Pharmergibbs [ Sun Sep 13, 2009 5:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Lunt is great and if he improves at the same rate next year we may be looking at a future international! Moore has been superb though and offers different qualitys. He makes more incisive runs from dummy half than lunt tends to do ( unless it is on the try line ) and I think is a very steady player. As for next year I think between Lunt, drew, carlile and fooey( if he stays) the loss of Moore will have a minimal effect. Still, scott has been great for us and I wish him all the best for the future |
|
| Author: | PONNER [ Sun Sep 13, 2009 5:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Moore has been getting a reputation as the next Cunningham but to be honest I think Lunt is the nearest thing to him. How many tries has Lunt score from the play the ball this season and barged his way over like KC. Moore started the season off like a house on fire but at the moment i'd choose Lunt and Faiumu over him. |
|
| Author: | SHIPLEYGIANT [ Sun Sep 13, 2009 6:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Shaun Lunt is without doubt class - he has been one of the stand out performers this season for the Giants. |
|
| Author: | meast [ Sun Sep 13, 2009 6:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
i dont think anyone would have predicted shaun would be up there as one of our top men this year. what a cracking player he is turning out to be and in february he probably hoped to get a few first team games under his belt. sadly,scotty seems to have gone off the boil recently, still a good player who no doubt will be top class in years to come, but i think we have a more than adequate replacement in lunty |
|
| Author: | Matt01 [ Sun Sep 13, 2009 7:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Lunt is quality and with Drew coming in I don't think losing Moore will be too bad, even though he has been a very good performer for us. I think the harder player to replace will be Fulton, his kicks gain us so many extra yards. |
|
| Author: | SaintsFan [ Sun Sep 13, 2009 7:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
meast wrote:i dont think anyone would have predicted shaun would be up there as one of our top men this year. We trained him, so it's no surprise.  Quote:sadly,scotty seems to have gone off the boil recently, still a good player who no doubt will be top class in years to come, but i think we have a more than adequate replacement in lunty
That couldn't have anything to do with the fact that Saints told Brown to back off earlier in the season could it by any chance? Moore may have been sidelined as a result. |
|
| Author: | max fisher [ Sun Sep 13, 2009 7:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
knew lunt was going to be great since seeing him play for cas' u18's in the grand final against saints in 2004.. jesus we should have worked harder to keep him! |
|
| Author: | goodie [ Sun Sep 13, 2009 8:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
dont think we will miss moore at all lunt and fooey far better players for me, just dont see the hype over scotty makes far too many errors for me. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|