WWW.RLFANS.COM
https://rlfans.com/forums/

The Warrington 17:
https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=427385
Page 1 of 4

Author:  Wadski [ Fri Aug 28, 2009 11:06 am ]
Post subject:  The Warrington 17:

Richie Mathers

Chris Riley
Matt King
Chris Bridge
Chris Hicks

Vinnie Anderson
Lee Briers

Adrian Morley
Michael Monaghan
Garreth Carvell
Louis Anderson
Ben Westwood
Ben Harrison

Subs:
Mickey Higham
Mike Cooper
Paul Johnson
Tyrone McCarthy

Source


seems odd to name the 17 already.
Richie Mathers

Chris Riley
Matt King
Chris Bridge
Chris Hicks

Vinnie Anderson
Lee Briers

Adrian Morley
Michael Monaghan
Garreth Carvell
Louis Anderson
Ben Westwood
Ben Harrison

Subs:
Mickey Higham
Mike Cooper
Paul Johnson
Tyrone McCarthy

Source


seems odd to name the 17 already.

Author:  Danril [ Fri Aug 28, 2009 11:12 am ]
Post subject: 

Smoke & mirrors perhaps?

Author:  Code13 [ Fri Aug 28, 2009 11:12 am ]
Post subject: 

wonder if its tony smith head games, or a leak, or just bad journalism?

Author:  manoa thompsons knees [ Fri Aug 28, 2009 11:24 am ]
Post subject: 

Couple of people on our forum named this team a few days ago, does seem strange it was leaked out.

Author:  Wire_85 [ Fri Aug 28, 2009 11:26 am ]
Post subject: 

Can't see it being a leak the reporter in question would lose his job for sure.

Author:  RAI of Champions [ Fri Aug 28, 2009 11:32 am ]
Post subject: 

Wire_85 wrote:Can't see it being a leak the reporter in question would lose his job for sure.


Mike Parsons couldn't lose his job if he was sent to prison :wink:

I'm sure I remember other teams in the past naming their 17 the day before the game. I wouldn't be shocked if Nathan Brown named his later on today.

Apart from the lack of props, I'm quite happy with that squad anyway

Author:  Don Brennan [ Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:17 pm ]
Post subject: 

RAI of Sunshine wrote:Mike Parsons couldn't lose his job if he was sent to prison :wink:

I'm sure I remember other teams in the past naming their 17 the day before the game. I wouldn't be shocked if Nathan Brown named his later on today.

Apart from the lack of props, I'm quite happy with that squad anyway


Against Saints you might be alright,against Hudds that could be a problem.

Author:  Danril [ Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:20 pm ]
Post subject: 

If that is the team then it seems like Smith is hoping to utilise the dummy half and then throw it wide. Carvell and Morley are formidable but they don't have much in the way of back up.

Equally though our second row seems a tad light. Brown looks to have sacrificed a bit of size for Finnigan and Raleigh, who whilst both make yards also concede penalties. Had Raleigh a bit more fitness I reckon he would have been picked though.

Author:  Fantastic Mr Catpiss [ Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:22 pm ]
Post subject: 

Code13 wrote:wonder if its tony smith head games, or a leak, or just bad journalism?


head games-ish, get the team out, we're not waiting and seeing, that's what you've got to deal with Mr Brown.

To use a judo reference, we're on the tatami first.


Though Rugby league isn't played on tatami, i know.

Author:  Wadski [ Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:33 pm ]
Post subject: 

Tony Catsmith wrote:head games-ish, get the team out, we're not waiting and seeing, that's what you've got to deal with Mr Brown.

To use a judo reference, we're on the tatami first.


Though Rugby league isn't played on tatami, i know.


Does tatami mean ropes?

You're on the ropes first?

Page 1 of 4 All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/