| WWW.RLFANS.COM https://rlfans.com/forums/ |
|
| Attention Matt King....................... https://rlfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=420469 |
Page 1 of 5 |
| Author: | Pharmergibbs [ Sun Jul 19, 2009 5:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Attention Matt King....................... |
............It is now safe to climb out of Michael Lawrence's pocket! |
|
| Author: | Code13 [ Sun Jul 19, 2009 5:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Also, sliding into a players legs with your boots is not the mark of a player with any talent or class...but then thats King allright. |
|
| Author: | JudgeB [ Sun Jul 19, 2009 5:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Few blackmarks to Warrington today; King sliding in after the try was scored. Could easily have been an eight point try. Clarke with a high tackle whilst taking out Brett after he kicked through and went on the chase. Warrington player - can't remember who - treading on Brett following a tackle. High tackle on Robbo - can't say how bad but reaction from LB Stand gave a reasonable indication that more action should have been taken by Smith. When is Cummings going to take action against underperforming referees and touch judges. Let's hope the disciplinary take some action - won't hold my breath. |
|
| Author: | COCKNEY GIANT [ Sun Jul 19, 2009 6:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I did not see any Matt King magic today and TBH I thought he was appalling, shocking in fact. Well done ML ! |
|
| Author: | FLYINGPROP [ Sun Jul 19, 2009 6:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Smith was shocking too, a ruddy disgrace. How the Robbo tackle did not go on report at least is beyond me. Anyone any idea of the penalty count today as it must have been 14-2 against the Giants? |
|
| Author: | Raaaaymond [ Sun Jul 19, 2009 6:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
FLYINGPROP wrote:
Anyone any idea of the penalty count today as it must have been 14-2 against the Giants? I counted it at 14-4 to wires. Never mind the pens. How about Carney's knock on, not given when he pulled it back to himself but three against us that looked to go backwards ? Oh well, he missed Bruno's blatent knock on when we were under pressure near our own line so I'm not complaining. 
|
|
| Author: | Durham Giant [ Sun Jul 19, 2009 6:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
The high shot on Robbo was just a lazy arm nothing malicious and not with much power behind it. Looked worse than it was IMO. |
|
| Author: | Birkbygiant [ Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Durham Giant wrote:The high shot on Robbo was just a lazy arm nothing malicious and not with much power behind it. Looked worse than it was IMO.
I have to disagree I thought it was a desperate late challenge which had he missed would have led to a Robo try, how he was not cautioned was appalling from the ref who certainly could not be called a homer, despte the blatent knock on from Bruno. |
|
| Author: | Code13 [ Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Yup, if he hadnt stuck his arm out it would have been a try to Robbo |
|
| Author: | Durham Giant [ Sun Jul 19, 2009 7:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
i agree it would have been a try. |
|
| Page 1 of 5 | All times are UTC [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|