Wire Yed wrote:You can to a point make it commercially viable but not as Warrington A or Wigan A.
You create county teams, the clubs pay a general membership fee that is cheaper than running a team and that money goes to a central fund. The money is then divided out equally among the counties and you create a county tournament.
Age limit of 23 with a 3 players overage exemption (designed for returning players from injury).
The players playing for Wire don't all have to play for a Cheshire team so in essence you could have contracted Wire players dotted around in different county clubs based on certain eligibility.
Birth/Residence/Club Side.
Overseas players returning from injury only play based on club side.
Some players would be eligible for 3 teams some 2 and others only 1.
You don't lock yourself into one team either but only one team per season.
It's easy doable, you have a game semi centralised, county competition and a place to keep hold of the lads just that little bit longer. There are enough counties to form a league.
Lancs
Cumbria
Merseyside
Gtr Manchester
Cheshire
Humberside
North Yorkshire
South Yorkshire
London
Wales
France
Midlands and South West.
Can't agree with this sorry and not just the fact that you have left out West Yorkshire.
It seems barmy to me to add another separate layer of competition/admin when the structure should be/is in place already based on the club system. What's wrong with the system from how it is run/not run/funded? Additionally, why artificially create this new enterprise when at times 'we' can't seem to run what we have correctly?
As part of the licencing agreement, financing an 'A' team should be part of the deal not a voting matter whereby some clubs could abrogate their responsibilities to the game as a whole.