Captain Hook wrote:I still can’t see how we got a penalty try. My reading of it was if the tackle was a bit lower it wasn’t a certainty that a try would be scored (I’m fairly sure that’s the test).
Especially when Sutcliffe got held up over the line in the first half in a very similar tackle and we didn't even get a penalty. There were some strange decisions all around. Both teams got away with tackles that arguably could have brought about cards, but they chose to make an example of an accidental head clash.
Musgrove could do with not sprinting and then slowing down just before hitting the line.
For all he got wrong, got to thank Powell for james harrison, he's a pearler.
Wrench is gonna need to sort his defence out and quick, he's been pin pointed in all 3 games and you can see why.
Wood looked very solid during his stint.
Holroyd did OK, but got pulled after that knock on, didn't return other than curries hia. EDIT, JUST WATCHING THE GAME BACK IT WAS WOOD THAT CAME ON, TOO MANT MULLETS
karetaker wrote:Guardian says 11-9 in our favour on penalties, can’t see how that’s right it felt like every set we conceded a penalty.
9 is still too many but possibly indicative of where the game is at the minute in terms of clearing up head contact and the ruck.
More frustrating to me than the penalties was where they were conceded, we seemed to constantly give away penalties in their 20m area, that coupled with a sub 70% completion rate meant we couldn’t build any pressure. Wigan & Saints are the standout teams, they build pressure well and points come off the back of that.
I thought Walker was pretty good overall. Wasn't it Walker's kicks that resulted in the drop outs? I was in the southeast corner and couldn't tell if it was him or Drinkwater.
Joined: Jul 17 2015 Posts: 4714 Location: Sitting on the naughty step
Fantastic Mr Catpiss wrote:What play acting? He's got blood pouring into his eye, what would you do?
I think they are suggesting an RU style “blood gate” ie Currie had a bag of fake blood stashed in his shorts and at an opportune moment pulled it out and broke it above his eye to make it look like blood was gushing form a non existent wound… given that the username suggests they are a child of Jacob Rees-Mogg anything is possible
Just my opinions unless it's a FACT, in which case it's a fact.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum