Well, considering Fakir got one match in the same game, what do you think will happen with consistency.

For an entirely different offence...

I don't think so.

Talking of Fakir, I thought his tackle on Gleeson in the opening minutes was a bannable one as well.

You'll never get consistency simply because no two incidents are identical. Westwoods looked deliberate and malicious, and you don't honestly see that very often

Having already targetted Morley with an elbow to the ribs, it could be argued that there was more 'evidence' of Fakir deliberately going high on Morley than Westwood on Carlaw!

Five games for Westwood is one more than I thought it should be, but under the circumstances I don't think he can complain. One game for Fakir, who does have history too, is a pretty poor decision in my opinion.

So, what's the difference between a smash in the face by the arm and a smash in the face by the arm.

The only real difference i can see was that one was carried off on a stretcher, the other wasn't and one was met with histrionics by the commentating team whereas the other was only worthy of a "he didn't miss"

thing is though thel(can i call you that) catalans didn't get rough in the game, certainly not according to our head coach.

Agreed, There is no need for it.
I wish they would get sent off as well though.

Westwood nearly kills someone and gets to stay on,
one of the french players brushes a players shirt and gets 10 mins in the sin bin

yes, perfectly well reasoned and described there.



I say it again, anyone who thinks saints fans are big headed know it alls, we're all wrong.