Aaw Play penny pleeeeaaaasssseeeeeeeeee !! aw go on.....any chance of playing Penny AND Riley now that would be a bonus and well worth the ticket price, and petrol cost for the whole family !! A good day out and a good laugh to go with it !!!
Rhino Roy wrote:Aaw Play penny pleeeeaaaasssseeeeeeeeee !! aw go on.....any chance of playing Penny AND Riley now that would be a bonus and well worth the ticket price, and petrol cost for the whole family !! A good day out and a good laugh to go with it !!!
Has Trigger signed in with your username?
Didn't William Webb Ellis pick up the ball and run, someone should really tell Rugby Union.
Joined: Sep 26 2006 Posts: 10645 Location: Killing the Ball!
SEB wrote:He was a fullback for Woolston Rovers.
Thought that too but who am i to argue with the man himself.
Quote:Riley Said: “It’ll be good if I get another chance playing full back too because I love playing there and I will work my hardest to keep my spot.
“When I was younger I was a winger but when I joined the academy, I became a full back and I enjoyed the freedom I got playing there.*
Thought that too but who am i to argue with the man himself.
Quote:Riley Said: “It’ll be good if I get another chance playing full back too because I love playing there and I will work my hardest to keep my spot.
“When I was younger I was a winger but when I joined the academy, I became a full back and I enjoyed the freedom I got playing there.*
Joined: Oct 30 2005 Posts: 6268 Location: Warrington UK
I'd personally give Riley a week off.
Hicks at full back and Penny outside Gleeson.
Obviously the best combination would be Gleeson/King but im not sure the other side would look too stable unless you went Bridge/Hicks
Thelonius wrote:If it was down to me I would bring Penny back but play him outside of anyone other than King. I would also stick with Riley at fullback for the time being as I believe that out of everyone currently at the club, he is most likely to be the first choice fullback in years to come. Monas needs to be moved to hooker sooner rather than later, and Bridge needs to partner Briers in the halves to give us a more dynamic partnership.
In my mind the best compromise to acheive all this would be Riley at fullback and play King outside Gleeson. If an Australian international (even an average one) can't switch wings then he may as well tear up his own contract and go back on the bins at home). If King can't find his confidence playing outside Gleeson then he will never find it. If Gleeson can make a donkey like Henry or a journeyman player like Hicks look good, then if it clicks what can he do with King?
At left centre I would play Hicks. This isn't an ideal solution, but he does have experience as an NRL centre and, as already said, there have to be some compromises somewhere. Outside Hicks I would play Penny.
This would free up Bridge to go into the halves, then Monas to Hooker, then Higham to impact hooker, where I believe he will be more effective than in his current 80 minute slot.
You have got to be joking.
I wish he was still here.
Bob Paisley wrote:A lot of teams beat us, do a lap of honour and don't stop running. They live too long on one good result. I remember Jimmy Adamson crowing after Burnley had beaten us once and that his players were in a different league. At the end of the season they were.
WireFanatic II wrote:Why, if it isn't Catalancs, RLFANS answer to a question no-one asked!
Joined: Dec 29 2005 Posts: 427 Location: Manchester
Rob Wire wrote:I`m not sure who your referring too here as i certainly havn`t said that Chris Riley has been our best player in any game previously, what i said was he has been solid previously without being spectacular.
I was referring to Latchford Wolvesfan's comments earlier.
I thought Riley was starting to look ok last season on the wing, but he has gone backwards along way at full back. If he is to play, it should be on the wing.
Joined: Apr 26 2005 Posts: 4190 Location: Under the thumb!
keithcun wrote:You have got to be joking.
I wish he was still here.
OK, perhaps Donkey was a bit severe, cart horse may have been more appropriate (I was a Henry fan btw)
My point being that Henry was hardly the worlds most agile, dynamic or speedy winger. In the words of Brian Moore (talking about Ronald Koeman) "Built like a battleship, and turns like one too". Yet playing outside Gleeson, and with Briers putting the ball in the air, Henry was able to score far more than he perhaps should have. If Henry was able to do so well outside of Gleeson and bearing in mind that many posters grannies (who have been dead 17 years) could score 20 a season outside Gleeson, how well would King do? Surely worth a try?
Eddie Hemmings said not wrote:"Remember last time they were here, the Huddersfield Giants, they lost to a Luke Walsh drop goal. He's only scored four drop goals in his St Helens career has Luke Walsh and each and every one of them have been scored by Luke Walsh"
Joined: Oct 30 2005 Posts: 6268 Location: Warrington UK
Thelonius wrote:OK, perhaps Donkey was a bit severe, cart horse may have been more appropriate (I was a Henry fan btw)
My point being that Henry was hardly the worlds most agile, dynamic or speedy winger. In the words of Brian Moore (talking about Ronald Koeman) "Built like a battleship, and turns like one too". Yet playing outside Gleeson, and with Briers putting the ball in the air, Henry was able to score far more than he perhaps should have. If Henry was able to do so well outside of Gleeson and bearing in mind that many posters grannies (who have been dead 17 years) could score 20 a season outside Gleeson, how well would King do? Surely worth a try?
Should we have to do that though on what he's alledgedly paid?
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
(I was a Henry fan btw)
