Bunkaib wrote:Leeds successful on Cam Smith appeal what's people's thoughts?
Leeds are terrible and you can beat them even with your front row missing. Smith had to be pardoned though, the decision to sanction him in the first place was embarrassing. Even the grade A he ended up with is shocking.
Joined: Jul 17 2015 Posts: 4682 Location: Sitting on the naughty step
karetaker wrote:He is not Paul Vaughan and he does not play for Warrington.
Vaughan was always going to be banned. His arm was between the legs when he lifted, lucky the guy landed on his shoulders. can’t see what the problem is with his ban. No need to indulge in Sad One’s “victimisation†theme.
Just my opinions unless it's a FACT, in which case it's a fact.
Joined: Oct 06 2005 Posts: 2848 Location: Warrington
I don't believe in any conspiracy just the wild inconsistencies. I'd be turning up and playing the video of Harry Smith's tip tackle alongside Vaughan's and asking for the justification of Vaughan's 2 game ban when Smith was cleared. Vaughan's tackle looks a lot less dangerous than that of Smith's.
Joined: Jul 17 2015 Posts: 4682 Location: Sitting on the naughty step
ratticusfinch wrote:I don't believe in any conspiracy just the wild inconsistencies. I'd be turning up and playing the video of Harry Smith's tip tackle alongside Vaughan's and asking for the justification of Vaughan's 2 game ban when Smith was cleared. Vaughan's tackle looks a lot less dangerous than that of Smith's.
The Smith decision was wrong, doesn’t mean the Vaughan one is.
Just my opinions unless it's a FACT, in which case it's a fact.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
