Wires71 wrote:Ashton is great. But Monaghan or Hicks would be ahead of him in my SL era stakes.
Monaghan I can understand. I don't agree but I understand. I just don't get the Hicks love in.
This isn't even a debate to me. Ashton is better than Hicks was
Ashton is a lot faster
Ashton makes more yards running it in.
Hicks was better in the air
Hicks was possibly marginally better in defence.
Ashton's finishing is better.
Overall, I can't see why people still go on about Hicks. How many would Hicks score over the last few years for us playing outside the centres that Ashton has had to. T King and Ratchford versus M King and Bridge. This isn't even taking into account how dominant our pack was while Hicks was here. So we we got downfield a lot easier and created more opportunities for our outside backs as a result.