Reading that report, it is actually rather indefensible and Pryce already has some history. And just in case you have forgotten; http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/gene ... 75686.html

Reading that report, it is actually rather indefensible and Pryce already has some history. And just in case you have forgotten; http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/gene ... 75686.html

Sorry folks. As you probably know we do not allow discussion of ongoing court cases on the site due to the sub judice laws in this country. This is covered in the AUP.

Although a verdict has been reached in this case, by law the matter only concludes once a sentence has been passed. So this is still an active proceeding and so the same rule still applies.