Post subject: Re: depending on the may 6th decision
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2010 5:51 pm
Bigpev
International Chairman
Joined: Feb 27 2002 Posts: 6769 Location: Lording it up in Wardley
no, but if you read the Tory leader in Salford Karen Greedio's letter in the advertiser she appears to think that the average person in Salford is thick and don't see news outside of Salford, so if she or the really thick Norman Owen go power in Salford the money would be pulled, Normans against any spending unless it is on him. Beware the liberals in Eccles they will say anything to get what they want wether it be lies or not.
Vote Labour to keep the Stadium
Holts Sweet Holts
Never Drink on an Empty Head
BIGPEV THE ONLY MAN TO GET A REAL INJURY AT THE STOOP
Post subject: Re: depending on the may 6th decision
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2010 7:07 pm
shed head
Club Coach
Joined: Oct 08 2004 Posts: 672 Location: Salford
Kersal and Broughton are no longer "IN SALFORD", below is the proof, we are now under manchester! so maybe we need to lobby Graham Stringer although he's probably not even aware that Salford City Reds exist.
"Currently the Kersal and Broughton Wards fall within the Salford Constituency. However, at the dissolvement of Parliament these two wards will fall within the Blackley & Broughton Constituency, which will be under the jurisdiction of Manchester City Council."
Post subject: Re: depending on the may 6th decision
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2010 10:41 pm
Scanners
Player Coach
Joined: Apr 07 2010 Posts: 168
murphyboy389 wrote:and the torys got in, could they influence the stadium, seeing as salford council are sponsoring?
The Tories another excuse for the stadium not being built?? Where are things up to anyway? I went to the Trafford Centre over easter and there's no work going on.
Post subject: Re: depending on the may 6th decision
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2010 10:56 pm
Original Salford City Red
Player Coach
Joined: Sep 20 2006 Posts: 961 Location: Walkden "In Salford"
Bigpev wrote:no, but if you read the Tory leader in Salford Karen Greedio's letter in the advertiser she appears to think that the average person in Salford is thick and don't see news outside of Salford, so if she or the really thick Norman Owen go power in Salford the money would be pulled, Normans against any spending unless it is on him. Beware the liberals in Eccles they will say anything to get what they want wether it be lies or not.
Vote Labour to keep the Stadium
Pev which politician called the stadium in for a public enquiry? a move which cost us 9/12 months in time and 400/500k in money.
Without the "calling in" the stadium would have been finished.
A clue he has two Jags and claimed for a couple of mock tudor columns for the front of his mansion,sorry house, in Hull.
Post subject: Re: depending on the may 6th decision
Posted: Sat Apr 10, 2010 9:06 am
redmatt77
Player Coach
Joined: Jan 28 2007 Posts: 216
Bigpev wrote:no, but if you read the Tory leader in Salford Karen Greedio's letter in the advertiser she appears to think that the average person in Salford is thick and don't see news outside of Salford, so if she or the really thick Norman Owen go power in Salford the money would be pulled, Normans against any spending unless it is on him. Beware the liberals in Eccles they will say anything to get what they want wether it be lies or not.
Vote Labour to keep the Stadium
Correct me if im wrong but didnt Labour try to put the kybosh on the stadium? Vote anyone but Labour to keep the Stadium
Post subject: Re: depending on the may 6th decision
Posted: Sat Apr 10, 2010 1:16 pm
Bigpev
International Chairman
Joined: Feb 27 2002 Posts: 6769 Location: Lording it up in Wardley
Original Salford City Red wrote:Pev which politician called the stadium in for a public enquiry? a move which cost us 9/12 months in time and 400/500k in money.
Without the "calling in" the stadium would have been finished.
A clue he has two Jags and claimed for a couple of mock tudor columns for the front of his mansion,sorry house, in Hull.
self interest on his part no just that Manchester put an objection in because we wouldn't move to Maine road and solve a problem for them, without that it would not have been called in, but would it have been built yet now that is a good question?
Holts Sweet Holts
Never Drink on an Empty Head
BIGPEV THE ONLY MAN TO GET A REAL INJURY AT THE STOOP
Post subject: Re: depending on the may 6th decision
Posted: Sat Apr 10, 2010 1:29 pm
Original Salford City Red
Player Coach
Joined: Sep 20 2006 Posts: 961 Location: Walkden "In Salford"
Bigpev wrote:self interest on his part no just that Manchester put an objection in because we wouldn't move to Maine road and solve a problem for them, without that it would not have been called in, but would it have been built yet now that is a good question?
Pev I stand correcting if anyone knows any different but the objection from Manchester Council was I understand dropped prior to the enquiry.
On the occasions that I attended the enquiry and I was there most of the time I cannot recollect any representative from Manchester being in attendance and on the first day the inspector actually said that it was the first enquiry that he had chaired where there appeared to be no objectors present.
A nice little earner for a few people wouldn't you say?
Post subject: Re: depending on the may 6th decision
Posted: Sat Apr 10, 2010 2:54 pm
Bigpev
International Chairman
Joined: Feb 27 2002 Posts: 6769 Location: Lording it up in Wardley
correct OSCR, but by the time they withdrew the damage had been done. IMO I still say we should have built at West One before the shops and all the rest went up, but the council said no.
Holts Sweet Holts
Never Drink on an Empty Head
BIGPEV THE ONLY MAN TO GET A REAL INJURY AT THE STOOP
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 76 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum