EX.SALF.UNI wrote:Give me a f*cking break...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b54b5/b54b559a6b2b7af1449731aa18b8f40b0f4bf8d8" alt="Rolling Eyes :roll:"
Not entirely sure you are being serious but . . .
The point I was trying to make was that the club employ several full-time people in marketing and administration roles as part of the Superleague criteria. Surely these employees are aware that the new site has never functioned properly since it's launch several months ago and you would think one of them would raise the issue and get it resolved?
Therefore if they can't identify and sort out a problem like this what hope is there for these people to take our club forward off the field?
To me the club website is a vital tool for promoting and selling the club. If potential new fans or sponsors visit the site for the first time and it's either really slow or not working properly it reflects badly on the club. (First Impressions)
For instance I've just been to the Reds site now to test how long it took to fully load the homepage and it took a staggering 1 minute and 30 seconds!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67229/67229e45e86f82ac4197c2e193fd40494e1800a6" alt="Shocked :shock:"
(As a Comparison I went to the Widnes Vikings site and it loaded in less than 10 seconds and it had video highlights on the homepage)
Using Widnes as another example when Steve O'Conner bought the club one of the first things he invested in was a superb new website because as a successful businessman he knew the importance of a great site.