WOULD YOU MAKE ANY CHANGES THIS WEEK IF SO WHO AND WHAT POSITIONS ME JEWITT IN FOR NASH RATCHFORD IN FOR PAUL

NEVER CHANGE A WINNING TEAM.....UNTIL YOU HAVE TO...

Would like to see either Turner or Ratchford come into the side. Maybe Jewitt or Sidlow in for Nash, might be worth rotating these three for a few games and see which one performs the best.

I'd let Paul get off early to the BBC and get his broadcasting commitments done and give Ratchford or turner his place and as stated above i'd give Nash's place to Sidlow or Jewitt for thier physical presenc and maybe helping off set the obviously pre planned total front row change.

Here we go again...Ratchford must play, he's the new peter sterling, robbie paul's old and past it etc etc

I'd pick the same starting 13 with Lulu, Paul, Adamson, Nash/Sidlow/Jewitt on the bench...no real need in changing things too much, we played fairly well and won last week.

Just switching Nash for sidlow only change

ok sorry ratchford or turner must come in for paul he isnt the new peter sterling but he is going to be around for the next ten years unlike paul who for me is past and is only concern is the bbc. but then again lets upset our young kids and let a has been kiwi take is place. we went poor when paul and nash came on the field.

And we were 18-0 up after 12 minutes with no Ratchford involved...does that mean we dont need him?? No it doesnt but as has already been discussed he will get his chances this season and its up to him to prove he's worth a regular place in the 17, but at the moment I dont see the point in changing a winning team.

Same team who played Celtic.

I would hope that a young, inexperienced, but undoubtably talented player faced with not being picked ahead of an established, experienced and not out of form player at an early stage of the season would show the maturity to realise that it's a squad game and we can't play everyone all the time and not get too upset about it in the knowledge that their time will come.